New drug applications (NDAs) in Japan are reviewed by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Those that pass the review are subsequently subject to deliberation by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Councils (MHLW-PAFSC), and the MHLW legislatively grants approval based on its positive opinions. However, little is known regarding the relationship between the PMDA review and the MHLW decision. We retrospectively assessed the MHLW decision of NDAs that passed the PMDA review at the initial MHLW-PAFSC deliberation from 2002 to 2022. The reasoning behind a non-supportive opinion from the MHLW-PAFSC and the sponsor's actions to overcome unresolved issues were also documented. A total of 2,117 of 2,153 (98.3%) NDAs that passed the PMDA review were approved at the initial MHLW-PAFSC deliberation with a positive opinion. The remaining 36 applications were not approved at the initial deliberation and subjected to continued deliberation because of a non-supportive opinion from the councils, although 29 were finally approved through revision of the application document (24 applications), re-analysis of the data (1 application), or additional clinical trials (4 applications). Seven applications have not been approved, of which one was refused, four were withdrawn, and two were unknown. The MHLW approves NDAs that passed the PMDA review at the initial deliberation at a high rate, suggesting that NDAs only suitable for approval passed the review and reached the MHLW-PAFSC deliberation. Only a few NDAs were not approved at the initial deliberation; however, most of them were finally approved.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3485DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pmda review
16
ndas passed
12
passed pmda
12
mhlw-pafsc deliberation
12
approved initial
12
initial deliberation
12
pharmaceuticals medical
8
medical devices
8
devices agency
8
ministry health
8

Similar Publications

BICSTaR (BICtegravir Single Tablet Regimen) is an ongoing, observational cohort study assessing the virologic effectiveness and safety of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in treatment-experienced (TE) and treatment-naïve (TN) people with HIV across 14 countries over 24 months. We present 12-month outcomes from participants in the BICSTaR Japan cohort. Retrospective and prospective data were pooled from people with HIV aged ≥20 years receiving B/F/TAF within routine clinical care in Japan.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cellular and gene therapy (CGT) products have emerged as a popular approach in regenerative medicine, showing promise in treating various pancreatic and liver diseases in numerous clinical trials. Before these therapies can be tested in human clinical trials, it is essential to evaluate their safety and efficacy in relevant animal models. Such preclinical testing is often required to obtain regulatory approval for investigational new drugs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent discussions about the utilization of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) have been more focused on drug development for regulatory approval rather than during the post-marketing stage. In Japan, RWD/RWE have been practically utilized as an external control for drug approval. Most cases were related to orphan diseases where the feasibility of conducting randomized controlled clinical trials was generally low.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: MET gene exon 14 skipping was identified as a potential driver mutation that occurs in approximately 3%-4% of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), typically in the absence of other driver mutations. Capmatinib and tepotinib were the first MET- tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MET-TKIs) approved by the FDA and PMDA, specifically for patients with metastatic NSCLC. Several studies have reported acquired resistance after MET-TKI treatment for MET mutation-positive NSCLC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue semaglutide is approved as an oral formulation for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. This study aimed to confirm bioequivalence between a new, second-generation (2G) oral semaglutide formulation (1.5, 4 and 9 mg) and the initially approved first-generation (1G) formulation (3, 7 and 14 mg).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!