Background: Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PFF) is of substantial interest for novel pharmacotherapy discovery, but little is known about clinical trial eligibility criteria. We evaluated eligibility criteria of PPF randomized controlled trials (RCTs), their representativeness in registry patients, and forced vital capacity (FVC) changes and mortality according to trial eligibility.

Methods: A systematic search was used to identify completed and in-progress phase II and III PPF RCTs. used in ≥60% of previous PPF RCTs were identified. The most common criteria for PPF used in RCTs ("trial-PPF criteria") and the clinical practice guideline definition of PPF ("guideline-PPF criteria") were both applied to patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter Canadian registry. Common trial eligibility criteria were tested for their frequency and association with health outcomes in registry patients who met trial-PPF and guideline-PPF criteria.

Results: Ten different definitions of PPF were used in 16 RCTs. At the time of meeting PPF definitions, 50% of 864 patients with trial-PPF and 44% of 408 patients with guideline-PPF met the common trial eligibility criteria. For both definitions, trial-eligible patients had more rapid 1-year FVC decline but better transplant-free survival than trial-ineligible patients. Patients with unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (ILD) had higher proportion of trial exclusion compared to those with connective tissue disease-associated ILD and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Annual FVC decline (trial-PPF: -67 to -21 mL; guideline-PPF: -116 to -41 mL) and 1-year transplant-free survival (trial-PPF: 90.5 to 97.5%; guideline-PPF: 87 to 96.2%) varied in trial-eligible patients across ILD subtypes.

Conclusions: Existing RCTs use a variety of definitions for PPF with eligibility criteria that have limited representativeness. FVC decline and transplant-free survival vary according to trial eligibility and ILD subtypes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01575-2024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eligibility criteria
24
trial eligibility
20
ppf rcts
16
fvc decline
12
transplant-free survival
12
patients
9
randomized controlled
8
progressive pulmonary
8
pulmonary fibrosis
8
ppf
8

Similar Publications

Drug Development.

Alzheimers Dement

December 2024

EQT Life Sciences Partners, Amsterdam, 1071 DV Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) trials report a high screening failure rate (potentially eligible trial candidates who do not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria during screening) due to multiple factors including stringent eligibility criteria. Here, we report the main reasons for screening failure in the 12-week screening phase of the ongoing evoke (NCT04777396) and evoke+ (NCT04777409) trials of semaglutide in early AD.

Method: Key inclusion criteria were age 55-85 years; mild cognitive impairment due to AD (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score of 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Drug Development.

Alzheimers Dement

December 2024

University of Southern California, San Diego, USA.

Background: Recruitment of demographically diverse participants into Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials, encompassing both screening and randomization, remains a consistent and persistent challenge contributing to underrepresentation of certain groups. Despite the exciting prospects of identifying therapeutic interventions for biomarker-eligible, cognitively unimpaired individuals, these studies grapple with the inherent complexities of AD trials coupled with intricate and time-consuming screening processes. Addressing this the issue of underrepresentation necessitates concerted and intentional efforts that prioritize inclusivity and equitable access to enroll adults meeting study criteria, reflecting the demographic and social diversity of North America.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Drug Development.

Alzheimers Dement

December 2024

Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Real-World data platforms for Alzheimer's Disease (AD) offer a unique opportunity to improve health equity through better understanding of health disparities and inclusivity in research, which is critical to translatability of research findings. AD research in the US and globally remains largely inaccessible to many individuals due to individual-level, study-level, investigator-level and larger systemic barriers. ALZ-NET, a US-based registry to evaluate longitudinal outcomes of patients being evaluated for or treated with novel FDA-approved AD therapy, and New IDEAS, an observational US-based longitudinal study of amyloid PET clinical utility, both offer opportunities for examining care, inclusivity, and disparities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Research heavily suggests that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), vital for neuronal growth and plasticity, and cholecystokinin (CCK), a satiety hormone that regulates BDNF levels, are altered in Alzheimer's Disease pathophysiology. Factors such as dysbiosis of gut microbiota and poor food habits may affect CCK and BDNF release and brain function. The objective is to evaluate the effects of dietary habits, gut microbiota, and exercise on BDNF and CCK release in Alzheimer's Disease patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Collaborative Approach for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders (AANHPI) Research and Education (CARE) is a recruitment registry that has enrolled over 10,000 AANHPI participants who expressed willingness to participate in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), aging, caregiving, and other health research. We report survey results from 24 of the 28 study principal investigators ("users") who utilized CARE between January 2021 and October 2023 to support their study recruitment.

Method: Users answered five questions on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = Strongly disagree to 3 = Strongly agree) related to (1) user experience, (2) usefulness in accelerating recruitment, (3) improving AANHPI representation, (4) whether they would use the registry again, and (5) whether they would recommend the registry to others.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!