Postoperative Pain in Vitreoretinal Surgery With Combined Regional-General Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Am J Ophthalmol

From the Department of Ophthalmology (Y. Chen S. and S.M.H.), National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. Electronic address:

Published: November 2024

Purpose: To investigate postoperative pain variations in vitreoretinal surgeries conducted with combined regional-general anesthesia or general anesthesia.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials published before December 26, 2023. Studies comparing vitreoretinal surgeries conducted under combined anesthesia to general anesthesia were included, while studies using only regional anesthesia were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool, and the results are presented as odds ratios or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). I statistic was calculated to assess heterogeneity. The primary outcomes in our study included the proportions of patients needing as-needed postoperative analgesics, dosage of as-needed postoperative analgesia medications, and time to the first demand for as-needed postoperative analgesia. The secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours (h), duration of surgery and anesthesia, and percentage of patients experiencing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Results: A total of 19 randomized controlled trials involving 1314 patients were analyzed. Combined anesthesia was associated with lower proportions of patients needing as-needed postoperative analgesics (odds ratio, 0.218 95% CI, 0.114-0.418, I = 55.2%), reduced dosage of as-needed postoperative analgesia medications (SMD, -1.429, 95% CI, -2.395 to -0.462, I = 90.4%), and longer time to the first demand for as-needed postoperative analgesia compared with general anesthesia alone (SMD, 2.650, 95% CI, 1.169-4.132, I = 96.5%). The effect of additional regional anesthesia lasted for 6 h (0.5 h SMD, -1.471, 95% CI, -2.498 to -0.444, I = 90.5%; 1 h, -1.507, -2.309 to -0.705, 92.7%; 2 h -1.487, -2.300 to -0.674, 93.2%; 4 h -1.052, -1.708 to -0.396, 89.5%; 6 h -1.053, -1.932 to -0.174, 93.4%; 12 h -0.286, -0.648 to 0.076, 57.1%; 24 h -0.297, -0.624 to 0.029, 64.0%). Combined anesthesia decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting risk without affecting the surgical or anesthesia duration.

Conclusions: Combined anesthesia demonstrated additional postoperative analgesic effects versus general anesthesia only. Further research is needed to validate the results of our study and to identify vision-threatening complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

as-needed postoperative
24
general anesthesia
16
combined anesthesia
16
postoperative analgesia
16
anesthesia
14
postoperative
12
postoperative pain
12
combined regional-general
8
regional-general anesthesia
8
versus general
8

Similar Publications

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To determine hospital length of stay (LOS) and long-term opioid consumption among patients who received inpatient multimodal analgesia following lumbar spine surgery, as opposed to those who received opioids alone.

Summary Of Background Data: Opioids have long been the historical choice for managing postoperative pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Opioids are still being prescribed to manage acute postsurgical pain. Unnecessary opioid prescriptions can lead to addiction and death, as unused tablets are easily diverted.

Methods: To determine whether combination nonopioid analgesics are at least as good as opioid analgesics, a multisite, double-blind, randomized, stratified, noninferiority comparative effectiveness trial was conducted, which examined patient-centered outcomes after impacted mandibular third-molar extraction surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate the role of the TYTOCARE™ telemedicine programme for home telemonitoring during the early postoperative period following radical cystectomy (RC) in a prospective single-centre study.

Materials And Methods: The study included patients aged <80 years with internet access who underwent RC at our institution between March 2021 and August 2023. Upon discharge, patients were monitored at home using the TYTOCARE™ telemedicine system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The analgesic efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in third molar extraction was evaluated in this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of subjects undergoing bilateral third molar extraction. Subjects were randomized 2: 1 to infiltration with LB (133 mg/10 mL) or placebo, and received opioid rescue medication as needed. Primary efficacy measure was cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale (NRS) pain severity scores through 48 hours (AUC of NRS0-48) postsurgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a cognitive decline and attention deficit that can occur in patients after cardiac surgery. Despite extensive research identifying the risk factors, POD often remains undiagnosed and untreated in medical settings. Therefore, this systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to summarize the available studies on early POD identification in patients following cardiovascular surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!