Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Parenteral antimicrobial treatment results in the excretion of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Dairy cows are commonly housed side by side in tie-stalls and often receive antimicrobial treatment. However, studies investigating treated cows as source of colonization of neighboring cows with resistant bacteria are scarce. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in cows (treated and untreated) in tie-stalls was investigated to assess their respective risks of carrying resistant bacteria. Furthermore, we analyzed associations of farm management with AMR. Case-control study: For isolation of indicator Escherichia (E.) coli, rectal swab samples were taken. Cows were sampled depending on treatment history and proximity to one another (cow A: recently treated parenterally; cow B: untreated, next to cow A; cow C: untreated, at considerable distance from all treated cows). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by microdilution. Associations of AMR with exposure to cow A, treatments, and management were analyzed using generalized mixed-effects logistic models. Susceptibility data on 571 isolates from 131 dairy farms were obtained. Almost no difference in proportions of resistant E. coli was observed between cows B and C (B: 53.4%; C: 57.2%; P = 0.52). Untreated cows had lower odds of carrying resistant E. coli than treated cows (B: OR 0.44, P<0.001; C: OR 0.54, P = 0.007). Non-pansusceptibility of isolates was associated with antimicrobial treatment (1 treatment: OR 2.11, P = 0.001; ≥2: OR 1.76, P = 0.043). Using manure on forage crops was associated with higher odds of pansusceptibility (OR 2.01, P = 0.004). For daily practice, with regard to the risk of AMR transmission, results of this study do not provide evidence for the need to separate treated cows from others during treatment in tie-stalls.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542856 | PMC |
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310431 | PLOS |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!