Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Dehiscence following esophagectomy for cancer has a mortality rate of 10-40%, prolongs hospital stay, and reduces survival. To prevent it, proper patient selection and surgical techniques that minimize tension and ischemia are essential. Procedures such as ERAS protocols and the use of indocyanine green have improved the detection of well-vascularized areas, but the leak rate still exceeds 10%. In a series of 12 patients who underwent robotic esophagectomy, 45.4% received a prophylactic stent. These patients had a mean hospital stay of 16 days, compared to 53.5 days for those who experienced dehiscence. Early endoscopy and the placement of a prophylactic stent proved to be safe and effective in reducing complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.17235/reed.2024.10800/2024 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!