Importance: Comparative effectiveness trials have not shown superiority of one type of physical rehabilitation over another following total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. We therefore ask the fundamental effectiveness question: Does physical rehabilitation "work" better than no physical rehabilitation?
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a 6-week program of physical rehabilitation (home-based telerehabilitation, or home-based rehabilitation) to no physical rehabilitation following THA and TKA.
Design: 3-arm,randomized, controlled, superiority trial with blinded outcome assessments. 377 patients (210 THA/167 TKA) were screened for eligibility before the targeted sample size of 168 patients was reached. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, at the end of intervention (6 weeks), and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-subscale: function in daily living. Secondary outcomes included: HOOS/KOOS-subscales: pain, symptoms, and quality of life, patient global assessment, analgesics, walking aids, 30-s chair stand test, 4 × 10 m fast-paced walk test, exercise adherence, and satisfaction.
Results: Comparing physical rehabilitation (home-based telerehabilitation, and home-based rehabilitation) to no physical rehabilitation, the mean group-differences for the primary outcome were 3.3 (95%CI: -1.9 to 8.6; p = 0.10) points at 6 weeks, and 1.9 (95%CI: -3.7 to 7.6; p = 0.25) and 2.6 (95%CI: -4.4 to 9.6; p = 0.23) points at the 3- and 12-months follow-ups, respectively.
Conclusion: Physical rehabilitation was not superior to the no physical rehabilitation comparator following THA or TKA in terms of self-reported function or any of the secondary outcomes.
Trial Registration: NCT03750448 (November 23, 2018), URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03750448.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539412 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100530 | DOI Listing |
J Hand Ther
January 2025
Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity. Conservative treatments are effective for treating mild and moderate CTS. There is still a need for studies to investigate the superiority of conservative treatments over each other.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Hand Ther
January 2025
Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Department of Neurology, İstanbul, Turkey; İstanbul Medeniyet University, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Background: Intraneural edema is an important factor in the pathophysiology of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD) is a manual treatment widely used to treat edema in a variety of conditions.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of MLD on intraneural edema of the median nerve in CTS patients, as well as its impact on symptom severity and hand function.
J Hand Ther
January 2025
Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic, Konya, Turkey.
Background: The effect of conservative treatments on sleep quality in carpal tunnel syndrome is unclear.
Purpose: Comparing the effect of splinting and kinesiotaping in carpal tunnel syndrome on functional status, pain, grip strength, nerve cross-sectional area and sleep quality.
Study Design: Randomized controlled study.
Eur Urol Focus
January 2025
Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Background And Objective: Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is commonly used in France in female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD). However, it has never been assessed using patient-reported outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of robotic AUS implantation using validated questionnaires.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt Neurourol J
December 2024
Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Purpose: While pump manipulation is rarely problematic in male patients with artificial urinary sphincters (AUSs), the situation may differ in female patients due to anatomical or cultural factors. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of difficulties in pump manipulation among female AUS patients, identify associated risk factors, and explore management strategies for this challenging issue.
Methods: Data were collected from all female patients who underwent a robotic AUS implantation at a single academic center between 2014 and 2022.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!