Influence of the post-processing protocol on a biocompatible 3D-printed resin.

J Prosthodont

Gerodontology and Special Care Dentistry Unit, Morales Meseguer Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the cytotoxic effects of a biocompatible 3D-printed resin used in occlusal devices, focusing on how different UV post-processing methods and rinsing solvents affect human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).
  • Sample discs were tested using various assays to assess cytocompatibility, and the samples were divided into groups based on the post-processing methods, including two types of UV polymerization and two rinsing solvents.
  • Results showed no significant differences in cytotoxicity across the different post-processing methods, indicating that all methods were equally safe for human gingival fibroblasts compared to the control group.

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of a biocompatible 3D-printed resin material for occlusal devices after post-processing with two different high-intensity UV-polymerization devices and two rinsing solvents, in the presence of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).

Material And Methods: Sample discs from the 3D-printed resin material were printed (2 mm in height and 6 mm in diameter [N = 40]) and divided into 4 groups (n = 10) based on post-processing methods: a high-intensity UV polymerization device with isopropyl alcohol, a high-intensity UV polymerization device with a modified glycol solvent, a UV cleaning and curing unit with isopropyl alcohol, a UV cleaning and curing unit with a modified glycol solvent, and a control group cultured in DMEM medium. Different tests were performed to evaluate their cytocompatibility on HGFs: MTT assay, cell migration assay, cell cytoskeleton staining, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and cell apoptosis and generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05).

Results: Cytocompatibility, MTT assay, cell migration assay, cell cytoskeleton staining, and SEM images were similar, regardless of the post-processing protocol, compared with the control group.

Conclusions: No differences were found in the cytotoxicity of the 3D-printed resin material for occlusal devices after the following post-processing methods: two different UV-polymerization devices and two rinsing solvents (isopropyl alcohol and a modified glycol solvent).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13980DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

3d-printed resin
16
assay cell
16
resin material
12
isopropyl alcohol
12
modified glycol
12
glycol solvent
12
post-processing protocol
8
biocompatible 3d-printed
8
material occlusal
8
occlusal devices
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!