A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Using machine learning to construct the diagnosis model of female bladder outlet obstruction based on urodynamic study data. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in women with strong detrusor contractions using urodynamic study (UDS) data.
  • Researchers analyzed UDS data from 134 female patients, developing eight diagnostic models using a machine learning technique that identified correlations between urinary flow indicators and lower urinary tract dysfunction.
  • The best model achieved an impressive AUC of 0.949, with 94.4% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 89.3% specificity, indicating its effectiveness in diagnosing BOO.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To intelligently diagnose whether there is bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in female with decent detrusor contraction ability by focusing on urodynamic study (UDS) data.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the UDS data of female patients during urination. Eleven easily accessible urinary flow indicators were calculated according to the UDS data of each patient during voiding period. Eight diagnosis models based on back propagation neural network with different input feature combination were constructed by analyzing the correlations between indicators and lower urinary tract dysfunction labels. Subsequently, the stability of diagnostic models was evaluated by five-fold cross-validation based on training data, while the performance was compared on test dataset.

Results: UDS data from 134 female patients with a median age of 51 years (range, 27-78 years) were selected for our study. Among them, 66 patients suffered BOO and the remaining were normal. Applying the 5-fold cross-validation method, the model with the best performance achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.949±0.060 using 9 UDS input features. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for BOO diagnosis model in the testing process are 94.4%, 100%, and 89.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: The 9 significant indicators in UDS were employed to construct a diagnostic model of female BOO based on machine learning algorithm, which performs preferable classification accuracy and stability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543646PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.20240111DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uds data
12
machine learning
8
diagnosis model
8
model female
8
bladder outlet
8
outlet obstruction
8
urodynamic study
8
female patients
8
uds
6
female
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!