"It's Just Really Important for Us All to Be on the Same Page": Qualitative Evaluation of Factors That Influence Written Mobility Communication.

Objective: Poor interdisciplinary team communication is a known barrier to increasing inpatient mobility. Understanding why and how clinicians from different disciplines communicate about mobility would help inform communication improvements. This qualitative interview study aimed to describe and explore clinician perceptions about written mobility communication and perceived barriers and enablers to this communication.

Methods: A rapid deductive qualitative approach was used to efficiently capture information for local improvement. Clinicians (physical therapists, nurses, physicians, and occupational therapists) working on 3 internal medicine wards in a metropolitan teaching hospital in Brisbane, Australia were purposefully sampled and invited to participate in individual interviews. Questions were based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using deductive and inductive thematic methods.

Results: From 17 interviews, key themes identified that written communication about patient mobility is important and valued by clinicians; clinicians learn documentation on the job, often from physical therapists; clinicians are not aware of organizational responsibility for mobility communication; multiple purposes for written communication contribute to multiple locations and inconsistency; and clinicians perceive that improvement would require a multidisciplinary and multilevel approach. Suggestions for improvement included the use of a common language, consistent use of existing bedside communication tools, and clearer responsibility for written communication about mobility.

Conclusion: Written communication about patient mobility was valued by clinicians, and a range of barriers to effective interdisciplinary communication was identified. Clear professional roles and responsibility for written mobility communication are important. Suggestions for improvement included an interdisciplinary language supported by multidisciplinary education and organizational governance.

Impact: Written communication about patient mobility is recognized as critical to safe, high-quality hospital care. Our findings suggest that successful mobility communication improvements must involve multiple disciplines and include clear organizational governance to support staff training, clear role responsibilities, and quality monitoring.

Lay Summary: This study found that staff on a medical ward think writing about mobility is important for patient and staff safety. Having clear roles and responsibilities for writing about mobility is important and consistency may be improved through education and training.