Importance: Limited randomized clinical trial data exist on the safety of simultaneous administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines.

Objective: To compare the reactogenicity, safety, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after simultaneous vs sequential receipt of messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine and quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4).

Design, Setting, And Participants: This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted between October 8, 2021, and June 14, 2023, at 3 US sites. Participants were nonpregnant persons aged 5 years or older with the intention of receiving both influenza and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Interventions: Intramuscular administration in opposite arms of either IIV4 or saline placebo simultaneously with mRNA COVID-19 vaccine at visit 1. Those who received placebo at visit 1 received IIV4 and those who received IIV4 at visit 1 received placebo 1 to 2 weeks later at visit 2.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary composite reactogenicity outcome was the proportion of participants with fever, chills, myalgia, and/or arthralgia of moderate or greater severity within 7 days after vaccination visits 1 and/or 2, using a 10% noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes were solicited reactogenicity events and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) for 7 days after each visit separately and HRQOL after visit 1, assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Index. Serious AEs (SAEs) and AEs of special interest (AESIs) were assessed for 121 days. Outcomes were compared between groups.

Results: A total of 335 persons (mean [SD] age, 33.4 [15.1] years) were randomized (169 to the simultaneous group and 166 to the sequential group); 211 (63.0%) were female, and 255 (76.1%) received bivalent BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The proportion with the primary composite reactogenicity outcome in the simultaneous group (25.6% [n = 43]) was noninferior to the proportion in the sequential group (31.3% [n = 52]) (site-adjusted difference, -5.6 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, -15.2 to 4.0 pp). Respective proportions in each group were similar after each visit separately (visit 1, 40 [23.8%] vs 47 [28.3%]; visit 2, 5 [3.0%] vs 9 [5.4%]). No significant group differences in participants with AEs (21 [12.4%] vs 16 [9.6%]), SAEs (1 [0.6%] vs 1 [0.6%]), and AESIs (19 [11.2%] vs 9 [5.4%]) were observed in the simultaneous vs sequential groups, respectively. Among participants with severe reactogenicity, the mean (SD) EQ-5D-5L Index score decreased from 0.92 (0.08) to 0.92 (0.09) prevaccination to 0.81 (0.09) to 0.82 (0.12) postvaccination.

Conclusions And Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial assessing simultaneous vs sequential administration of mRNA COVID-19 and IIV4 vaccines, reactogenicity was comparable in both groups. These findings support the option of simultaneous administration of these vaccines.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05028361.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541642PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43166DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mrna covid-19
24
simultaneous sequential
16
clinical trial
16
randomized clinical
12
covid-19 vaccine
12
visit received
12
visit
9
safety simultaneous
8
inactivated influenza
8
simultaneous administration
8

Similar Publications

The nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway triggers the degradation of defective mRNAs and governs the expression of mRNAs with specific characteristics. Current understanding indicates that NMD is often significantly suppressed during viral infections to protect the viral genome. In numerous viruses, this inhibition is achieved through direct or indirect interference with the RNA helicase UPF1, thereby promoting viral replication and enhancing pathogenesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The unrelenting emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants has significantly challenged the efficacy of existing COVID-19 vaccines. Enhancing the stability and immunogenicity of the spike protein is critical for improving vaccine performance and addressing variant-driven immune evasion.

Methods: We developed an mRNA-based vaccine, RV-1730, encoding the Delta variant spike protein with the S6P mutation to enhance stability and immunogenicity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: COVID-19 infection during pregnancy could be associated with placental histopathological changes such as vascular diseases and malperfusion. There are studies showing that mRNA vaccines are not associated with significant placental pathological changes. Our objective was to evaluate the placental histopathology in pregnant women who received Sinopharm, an inactivated virus vaccine, during pregnancy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We previously reported the safety and immunogenicity data from a randomized trial comparing the booster responses of vaccinees who received monovalent (MV) recombinant protein Beta-variant (MVB.1.351) and MV ancestral protein (MVD614) vaccines with AS03 adjuvant (Sanofi/GSK) to booster response of vaccinees who received mRNA MV ancestral strain BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The rapid development and deployment of mRNA and non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have played a pivotal role in mitigating the global pandemic. Despite their success in reducing severe disease outcomes, emerging concerns about cardiovascular complications have raised questions regarding their safety. This systematic review critically evaluates the evidence on the cardiovascular effects of COVID-19 vaccines, assessing both their protective and adverse impacts, while considering the challenges posed by the limited availability of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on these rare adverse events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!