Purpose: There is lack of evidence regarding the indication for re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT) for Ta high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aims to evaluate the oncological outcomes of patients with TaHG NMIBC to determine the benefit from performing reTURBT.

Methods: We relied on a multicenter cohort of 317 TaHG NMIBC from 12 centers who underwent TURBT and a subsequent complete Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction from 2009 to 2021. Kaplan Meier analyses estimated recurrence free survival (RFS) and progression free survival (PFS) according to reTURBT. Sub-analyses evaluated PFS in patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT according to international guidelines (multifocality, size > 3 cm, recurrent cancer, carcinoma in situ, lymph vascular invasion, histological variant, incomplete and absence of muscle layer at index TURBT). Multivariable cox-regression analysis predicted recurrence and progression.

Results: Of the 317 patients, 123 (39%) underwent reTURBT, while 194 (61%) did not. Residual disease was detected in 46% of cases, with a 3.2% upstaging rate. Median follow-up was 30 months. The 3-year RFS was higher in patients who underwent reTURBT (79% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in PFS. ReTURBT reduced the risk of recurrence [multivariable hazard ratio: 0.45, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.71]. Among patients who did not undergo reTURBT, those with ≥ 2 risk factors had lower 3-year PFS (73% vs. 92%, p < 0.001) than those with 0-1 risk factor, whereas no difference in 3-year PFS was observed in patients who underwent reTURBT regardless of the number of risk factors (85% vs. 87%, p = 0.8).

Conclusion: ReTURBT demonstrated efficacy in reducing recurrence among patients with TaHG NMIBC, yet its impact on progression remained uncertain. Our study underscores the importance of adhering to current international guidelines, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors indicating necessity for reTURBT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05342-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

re-transurethral resection
8
resection bladder
8
bladder tumor
8
patients tahg
8
invasive bladder
8
bladder cancer
8
tahg nmibc
8
free survival
8
underwent returbt
8
patients
5

Similar Publications

Purpose: There is lack of evidence regarding the indication for re-transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT) for Ta high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). This study aims to evaluate the oncological outcomes of patients with TaHG NMIBC to determine the benefit from performing reTURBT.

Methods: We relied on a multicenter cohort of 317 TaHG NMIBC from 12 centers who underwent TURBT and a subsequent complete Bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction from 2009 to 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: A re-transurethral resection of the bladder (re-TURB) is a well-established approach in managing non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for various reasons: repeat-TURB is recommended for a macroscopically incomplete initial resection, restaging-TURB is required if the first resection was macroscopically complete but contained no detrusor muscle (DM) and second-TURB is advised for all completely resected T1-tumors with DM in the resection specimen. This study assessed the long-term outcomes after repeat-, second-, and restaging-TURB in T1-NMIBC patients.

Methods: Individual patient data with tumor characteristics of 1660 primary T1-patients (muscle-invasion at re-TURB omitted) diagnosed from 1990 to 2018 in 17 hospitals were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate the rate and location of residual tumors in patients undergoing re-transurethral resection of bladder tumors (re-TURBT) and create a risk stratification tool for better treatment decisions.
  • 144 high-risk bladder cancer patients were analyzed to determine residual tumor rates, revealing significant factors like the type of cancer specialist, resection method, and tissue quality as risk indicators.
  • High-risk patients showed a notably higher rate of residual tumors and were found to benefit more from a second resection at the primary tumor site compared to low- and intermediate-risk groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Restaging transurethral resection in ta high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.

Curr Opin Urol

January 2022

Urology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France.

Purpose Of Review: The role of a re-transurethral resection (TUR) is clearly demonstrated in T1 high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. However, its role remains controversial for Ta high-risk tumors and the recent European guidelines stated that the second look procedure could be avoided for these patients despite harboring a high-risk of both disease recurrence and progression. We aimed to evaluate the added benefit on staging, response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin and oncological outcomes of re-TUR in patients with Ta high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!