Introduction: This study examines trends in executive compensation at non-profit hospitals across the United States from 2018 to 2022. The research aims to address gaps in the current literature by providing an up-to-date analysis of compensation practices and their relationship to hospital financial metrics.

Methods: A descriptive longitudinal study was conducted using data from Form 990 filings of 20 randomly selected non-profit hospitals across four U.S. regions. Executive compensation data, along with hospital financial metrics, were extracted and analyzed. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests for trend analysis, and correlation studies using Kendall's Tau B.

Results: The median increase in executive compensation over the five-year period was 23.4%, with a median annual increase of 6.2%. Significant positive correlations were found between executive compensation and hospital revenue (τ = 0.676, p < 0.001), net assets (τ = 0.600, p < 0.001), and net income (τ = 0.273, p < 0.001). However, percentage changes in these variables over time were not significantly correlated.

Conclusion: The study reveals significant growth in executive compensation at non-profit hospitals, with notable regional variations. While compensation correlates strongly with hospital financial metrics, the lack of correlation in their respective changes over time suggests a complex relationship. These findings raise important questions about resource allocation and compensation practices in non-profit healthcare institutions, highlighting the need for further research and policy discussions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535135PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.70911DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

executive compensation
24
non-profit hospitals
12
hospital financial
12
compensation
9
non-profit healthcare
8
compensation non-profit
8
compensation practices
8
financial metrics
8
0001 net
8
executive
6

Similar Publications

Background: Race differences on cognitive tests have been widely reported and attributed to psychosocial factors. Cognitive assessment via performance-based tests of everyday functioning may be less influenced by psychosocial factors, offering ecologically valid and less/unbiased measurement. This study examined differences between Black/African American and White older adults on traditional cognitive tests, self/informant report of everyday function, and a sensitive performance-based test of everyday function called the Naturalistic Action Task (NAT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Clinical rating scales and neuropsychological tests are commonly used for assessing sign and disease severity, yet lack detail in the early stages Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Existing evaluation methods can be subjective, nonlinear, expensive, or reliant on anecdotal evidence making objective and consistent characterization and phenotyping of AD difficult. Multimodal analysis of patient behavior, rather than scoring of patient-generated output which can be skewed by compensation strategies, presents a unique opportunity to objectively quantify AD related changes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study examines the influence of executives' accounting competence on relationship between goodwill impairment signal and goodwill impairment, considering the perspective of performance compensation commitment. The research employs an empirical research method and utilizes a sample of A-share listed companies in China that have signed performance compensation commitment agreements from 2007 to 2022. I found that the executives' accounting competence weakens the relationship between goodwill impairment signal and goodwill impairment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!