A new prognostic scoring system for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of new drugs.

Front Med (Lausanne)

Department of Hematology, Myeloma Research Center of Beijing, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Published: October 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study created a new predictive staging system to understand survival differences in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, analyzing data from 375 individuals at their center.
  • - Key factors influencing patient prognosis included elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, higher international staging system stages (II/III), and specific genetic abnormalities, leading to the classification of patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups.
  • - Validation of this risk model showed significant differences in 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) across the groups, indicating that this model can enhance risk assessment and personalized treatment planning in clinical practice.

Article Abstract

Background: We developed a new predictive staging system to explore the heterogeneity of survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients in the real world.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the predictive value of cytogenetic abnormal and clinical data in 375 patients with NDMM at our center. Established a weighted MM prognostic scoring system risk model and validated its predicted PFS and OS by external cohort.

Results: Elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels (1 point), international staging system stage II/III (1 point), 1q21+ ≥ 52.75% (0.5 point), del (17p) ≥ 3.5% (0.5 point), and t (14;16) ≥ 35.25% (1 point) had independent prognostic significance. Patients were further divided into three risk groups: low (I) (score 0-0.5, 16.5%), intermediate (II) (score 1, 46.7%), and high (III) (score 1.5-3, 36.8%). In the training cohort, the 3-year PFS was 79.5% vs. 65.3% vs. 40.3% ( < 0.001), and the 3-year OS was 87.7% vs.70.1% vs. 55% ( < 0.001) for the three risk groups. In the external validation cohort, the 3-year PFS was 85.5% vs.61.2% vs. 43.1% ( < 0.001) and the 3-year OS was 91.4% vs.83.5% vs. 56.9% ( < 0.001) for the three risk groups.

Conclusion: The risk stratification of this model shows good discrimination and calibration, and its application in clinical practice can improve the risk assessment of patients with NDMM and guide personalized treatment strategies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536264PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1473034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

three risk
12
prognostic scoring
8
scoring system
8
newly diagnosed
8
diagnosed multiple
8
multiple myeloma
8
staging system
8
patients ndmm
8
risk groups
8
cohort 3-year
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!