Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Insulin resistance is a hallmark feature of metabolic syndrome (MetSyn). The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is considered a reliable surrogate measure of insulin resistance. However, the efficacy of the TyG-index combined with adiposity measures for identifying MetSyn in U.S. adults is unknown.
Methods: In the present cross-sectional study, 2746 men and women from the 2017-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with physical and laboratory characteristics were included. Predictive powers (estimated by the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic [ROC-AUC]) of TyG-index combined with adiposity for MetSyn were compared with other traditional surrogate markers of insulin resistance including the TyG index, homeostatic assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), 1/fasting insulin, and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI).
Results: Predictive power of TyG-WHtR (ROC-AUC: 0.875) for MetSyn was highest, followed by TyG-WC (0.866), TyG-BMI (0.845), TyG index (0.832), HOMA-IR (0.820), QUICKI (0.820) and 1/fasting insulin (0.786). TyG-WHtR and TyG-WC showed significantly higher ROC-AUCs compared with TyG-index, HOMA-IR, 1/fasting insulin, and QUICKI (p ≤ 0.001).
Conclusions: TyG index combined with adiposity metrics is more effective in predicting MetSyn when compared to insulin resistance surrogates (TyG index, HOMA-IR, 1/fasting insulin, and QUICKI) which has been widely used in large cohort observational studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2024.11.001 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!