AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined how physical activity measurement methods (self-reported vs. accelerometer) impact the association between the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8) scores and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in older women.
  • A total of 4,243 participants with no prior CVD were analyzed over an average of 7.5 years, revealing 707 new CVD events during the study period, which demonstrated a lower risk of CVD with higher LE8 scores regardless of measurement method.
  • Results suggested that while accelerometer data may provide a more accurate assessment of physical activity for LE8 evaluation, self-reported measures can still be useful when accelerometers are not feasible.

Article Abstract

Objective: The American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8) metric includes self-reported physical activity as one of the metrics for assessing cardiovascular health. Self-reported physical activity is prone to misclassification, whereas accelerometer measures are less biased. We examined associations of LE8 and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) using self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity.

Methods: Participants in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health Study (n = 4,243; mean age = 79 ± 7 years) with no CVD history completed the WHI physical activity questionnaire and the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) questionnaire prior to wearing a hip-worn accelerometer for up to seven days in 2012-2014. LE8 components (physical activity, diet, sleep, body mass index, smoking, blood pressure, non-HDL cholesterol, and glucose) were scored according to guidelines. Scores were created using five physical activity measures: WHI questionnaire (LE8), CHAMPS (LE8), accelerometer-measured physical activity (LE8), and sample quantiles of accelerometer-measured physical activity (LE8) and daily steps (LE8). Hazard ratios (HR) for physician-adjudicated CVD were estimated using Cox regression.

Results: 707 incident CVD events occurred over an average 7.5 years. Multivariable HRs (95 % CI) comparing women in the highest vs. lowest quartiles of LE8 scores were: LE8 = 0.53 (0.43-0.67), LE8 = 0.47 (0.38-0.60), LE8  0.44 (0.36-0.56), LE8 = 0.44 (0.35-0.55), and LE8 = 0.45 (0.35-0.57).

Conclusions: The LE8-incident CVD association varies by physical activity measurement, however all methods showed reduced risk. Device-measures of physical activity may be more accurate in the LE8, but when impractical to implement, also support use of self-reported measures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11532471PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102904DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

physical activity
44
accelerometer-measured physical
12
activity
11
physical
11
le8
10
activity measurement
8
life's essential
8
incident cardiovascular
8
cardiovascular disease
8
self-reported physical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!