A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Territory-Wide Follow-Up of Primary and Secondary Extramammary Paget Disease of 2 Decades: Effects of Local Disease on Survival. | LitMetric

Introduction: Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is an uncommon malignant cutaneous neoplasm that are divided into primary and secondary forms. In this multicenter study, histologically proven cases of primary and secondary EMPD were reviewed for clinical outcomes with subgroup analysis for secondary EMPD.

Methodology: Cases of EMPD were identified from pathology report of the involved institutions over a period of over 2 decades. Cases of secondary EMPD were identified review of case notes, radiology, and pathology reports. Clinicopathological and outcome data were retrieved for statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 109 cases were retrieved, including 19 cases of secondary EMPD, most commonly associated with colorectal (n = 6), anal (n = 5), and prostatic carcinomas (n = 3). A difference was observed between older age and secondary (vs. primary) EMPD (p = 0.016), but no differences were seen in other clinico-demographical parameters. Male sex (p = 0.018), age over 60 years (p = 0.004), and involvement of margins (resectable) (p = 0.018) were associated with shorter OS. For DSS, involvement of margins (p = 0.009) was an adverse predictor. Secondary EMPD had a shorter DSS than primary EMPD (p = 0.005). Multivariable analysis confirmed all above associations (p < 0.05). In subgroup analysis for secondary EMPD, margin involvement remained associated with shorter OS (p = 0.007) and DSS (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Secondary EMPD is associated with poorer outcomes. Margin involvement is strong and independent indicator of shorter OS and DSS, including secondary EMPD. Resectability is a strong predictor of favorable outcome and excision with clear margins should be attempted when surgically feasible.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000541394DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

secondary empd
28
primary secondary
12
shorter dss
12
secondary
11
empd
11
extramammary paget
8
paget disease
8
subgroup analysis
8
analysis secondary
8
empd identified
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!