Some noncitizens in the US are not eligible for public health insurance, potentially reducing access to preconception, prenatal, and postpartum care. We compared insurance coverage and health care use from the preconception period to the postpartum period by immigration status, using representative survey data collected from six US states between 2020 and 2022. Respondents were surveyed at two to six months postpartum and at twelve to fourteen months postpartum. Immigration status was classified in three categories: US citizen, permanent resident, and people who were neither citizens nor permanent residents. Compared with US citizens, fewer permanent residents had late postpartum insurance coverage, but coverage rates were otherwise similar. Coverage was lower among noncitizens/non-permanent residents compared with US citizens at every time point except pregnancy, with the largest differences at preconception (50.5 percent and 90.5 percent, respectively) and late postpartum (53.2 percent and 95.1 percent, respectively). Fewer permanent residents had health care visits before pregnancy compared with US citizens, but health care use was otherwise similar. Noncitizens/non-permanent residents had substantially lower rates of preconception health care, early and adequate prenatal care, postpartum visits, and having a usual source of care at one year postpartum. Expansion of public insurance to cover immigrants is needed to reduce large inequities in perinatal health insurance and health care use by immigration status.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00204DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health care
24
immigration status
16
health insurance
12
permanent residents
12
compared citizens
12
care
9
perinatal health
8
health
8
insurance health
8
care immigration
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!