AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the rebound countermovement jump (R-CMJ) as a test for leg muscle function in NCAA Division I football players, comparing it with traditional tests like the counter-movement jump (CMJ) and drop jumps (DJs).
  • Findings indicated that while the first phase of the R-CMJ showed reliability similar to the CMJ, the jump height was lower, and the second phase displayed moderate reliability but raised concerns about its validity in measuring reactive strength.
  • Overall, although the R-CMJ is easy and time-efficient for coaches to administer, it may not accurately reflect an athlete's reactive strength compared to established jumping tests.

Article Abstract

Talpey, SW, Drake, M, Haintz, L, Belanger, A, O'Grady, MW, Young, WB, Mundy, PD, James L, Gabbett, TJ, Gardner, EC. The reliability and validity of the rebound countermovement jump in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I American Football Players. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the rebound countermovement jump (R-CMJ), as an alternate test of leg muscle function to the CMJ and drop jumps (DJs). Because the first phase of the R-CMJ mimics that of the CMJ, it is hypothesized that variables obtained in phase I of the R-CMJ will be like those of a CMJ. Similarly, because the second phase of a R-CMJ mimics a DJ, it is believed that the variables obtained from phase II will be like those from a DJ. Collegiate male American football players (N = 46) aged 18-24 years completed CMJs and R-CMJs on a portable force plate. Tests were completed on 3 separate days to determine the repeatability of select variables and to establish their validity. In addition, a subgroup (N = 20) of players from the cohort completed DJs from both 30 cm (DJ30) and 45 cm (DJ45) to determine the concurrent validity of the variables obtained from the second phase of the R-CMJ. Most variables obtained from the CMJ and R-CMJ phase I were found to be reliable, except for time-to-take-off. The variables from the DJ30, DJ45, and R-CMJ phase II displayed moderate to good reliability; however, all coefficient of variations were >10%. Jump height achieved in the CMJ was significantly greater than that achieved in phase I of the R-CMJ. The reactive strength index was significantly different in the R-CMJ compared with the DJ from both 30 and 45 cm heights. Although the R-CMJ may be inviting for coaches to use owing to its ease and time efficiency, the results of this study highlight that it may not provide a valid representation of an athlete's reactive strength.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004969DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

phase r-cmj
20
reliability validity
12
validity rebound
12
rebound countermovement
12
countermovement jump
12
american football
12
football players
12
r-cmj
10
jump national
8
national collegiate
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the rebound countermovement jump (R-CMJ) as a test for leg muscle function in NCAA Division I football players, comparing it with traditional tests like the counter-movement jump (CMJ) and drop jumps (DJs).
  • Findings indicated that while the first phase of the R-CMJ showed reliability similar to the CMJ, the jump height was lower, and the second phase displayed moderate reliability but raised concerns about its validity in measuring reactive strength.
  • Overall, although the R-CMJ is easy and time-efficient for coaches to administer, it may not accurately reflect an athlete's reactive strength compared to established jumping tests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!