A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Limit of detection of ser. Enteritidis using culture-based versus culture-independent diagnostic approaches. | LitMetric

Unlabelled: To prevent the spread of foodborne illnesses, the presence of pathogens in the food chain is monitored by government agencies and food producers. The culture-based methods currently employed are sensitive but time- and labor-intensive, leading to increasing interest in exploring culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) for pathogen detection. However, few studies quantify the relative sensitivity and reliability of these CIDTs compared to current approaches. To address this issue, we conducted a comparison of the limit of detection (LOD) for between a culture-based method and three CIDTs: qPCR (targeting and ), metabarcode (16S) sequencing, and shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Samples of chicken feed and chicken caecal contents were spiked with . serovar Enteritidis and subjected to culture- and DNA-based detection methods. To explore the impact of non-selective enrichment on LOD, all samples underwent both immediate DNA extraction and overnight enrichment prior to gDNA extraction. In addition to this spike-in experiment, feed and caecal samples acquired from the field were tested with culturing, qPCR, and metabarcoding. In general, LOD was comparable between qPCR and shotgun sequencing methods. Overnight microbiological enrichment resulted in an improvement in LOD with up to a three-log decrease. However, reads were detected in some unspiked feed samples, suggesting false-positive detection of . In addition, the LOD in feeds was three logs lower than in caecal contents, underscoring the impact of background microbiota on detection using all methods.

Importance: The appeal of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) is increased speed with lowered cost, as well as the potential to detect multiple pathogen species in a single analysis and to monitor other areas of concern such as antimicrobial resistance genes or virulence factors. This study provides quantitative data on the sensitivity of CIDTs relative to current approaches, which is essential for determining the feasibility of implementing these methods in pathogen surveillance programs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619426PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01027-24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

culture-independent diagnostic
12
limit detection
8
diagnostic tests
8
tests cidts
8
current approaches
8
caecal contents
8
cidts
5
detection
5
lod
5
detection ser
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!