A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Survival Rate of the Retention System for Extraoral Maxillofacial Prosthetic Implant: A Systematic Review. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - This systematic review focuses on the survival rates of different retention systems for extraoral implant-supported prostheses, aiming to fill a significant knowledge gap in existing literature.
  • - By identifying the most effective retention systems, the review intends to help clinicians choose the best attachments, thereby enhancing patient satisfaction with craniofacial prostheses.
  • - Following PRISMA guidelines, the review analyzed ten relevant studies from a pool of 2,857 articles published between 2002 and 2024, all in English and examining various retention techniques and associated outcomes.

Article Abstract

This systematic review examines the survival rate of retention systems available for extraoral implant-supported prosthesis as there appears to be a lack of information in the literature regarding the same due to the limited data that represents the benefits and drawbacks of each system. The current investigation addresses this gap. If clinicians recognize the optimal survival rate of each retention system, they can select the appropriate retentive attachments increasing patient satisfaction regarding the use craniofacial prosthesis. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the optimal retention system for implant-retained craniofacial prosthesis. This systematic review has followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive electronic database search was performed to locate research articles on implant-retained craniofacial prostheses published from 2002 to 2024. The included studies were conducted in the English language and specifically compared various retention techniques or provided information on the survival rate, mechanical behavior, and prosthetic complications. Ten of 2857 satisfied the requirements for inclusion and were analyzed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530083PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.70705DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic review
16
survival rate
12
retention system
12
rate retention
8
craniofacial prosthesis
8
implant-retained craniofacial
8
retention
5
systematic
5
system
4
system extraoral
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!