Does gender diversity affect the number and impact of publications among major academic institutes in India? Barriers and opportunities.

Background: A glaring gender inequality persists in global neurosurgery, influenced by various factors, including the notion that female neurosurgeons have lower academic output. This study aims to compare the research output of female and male neurosurgeons at the leading academic institutions in India.

Methods: The pertinent details regarding female neurosurgeons were collected from the Neurological Society of India (NSI) and Women In Neurosurgery (India) database. The institutes with at least five neurosurgery faculty recognised by the Medical Council of India (MCI) were included in the study. Various bibliometric parameters of male and female faculty at these academic centres were collected and compared using PubMed and Web of Science databases.

Results: Among the 2643 neurosurgeons in NSI, 113 were females (4.27%). Out of 156 faculty members across eighteen academic institutions, only seven (4.7%) were female, with eleven institutions lacking female faculty. Female academic neurosurgeons had slightly higher h-index (9.57 vs. 9.56), citation per publication (8.82 vs. 8.54), and original article percentage (47.5 vs. 46.5) compared to males. They also had more citations per year (34.01 vs. 33.17), while males had more total publications (51.19 vs. 46.71) and citations (565.22 vs. 533.57), but these differences weren't statistically significant. Only 4.1% (327/7955) of neurosurgery research was contributed by females. Female neurosurgeons authored articles received 3735 citations (4.2%) out of 87,953 total citations.

Conclusion: Female academic neurosurgeons in India exhibit comparable or superior academic output compared to their male counterparts, suggesting gender equality or even superiority in certain aspects of academic performance.