Purpose: Current practice is to report and manage likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants in a given cancer susceptibility gene as though having equivalent penetrance, despite increasing evidence of intervariant variability in risk associations. Using existing variant interpretation approaches, largely based on full-penetrance models, variants in which reduced penetrance is suspected may be classified inconsistently and/or as variants of uncertain significance. We aimed to develop a national consensus approach for such variants within the Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK) multidisciplinary network.
Methods: A series of surveys and live polls were conducted during and between CanVIG-UK monthly meetings on various scenarios potentially indicating reduced penetrance. These informed the iterative development of a framework for the classification of variants of reduced penetrance by the CanVIG-UK Steering and Advisory Group working group.
Results: CanVIG-UK recommendations for amendment of the 2015 ACMG/AMP variant interpretation framework were developed for variants in which (A) active evidence suggests a reduced-penetrance effect size (eg, from case-control or segregation data) and (B) reduced penetrance effect is inferred from weaker/potentially inconsistent observed data.
Conclusion: CanVIG-UK propose a framework for the classification of variants of reduced penetrance in high-penetrance genes. These principles, although developed for cancer susceptibility genes, are potentially applicable to other clinical contexts.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2024.101305 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!