Aims: Leadless pacing is a safe and effective alternative to transvenous pacing for bradycardia. Micra AV is a leadless, single-device solution that provides atrioventricular synchronous ventricular pacing therapy. Early results from the Micra AV CED study showed reductions in short-term complications associated with the Micra AV leadless pacemaker among US Medicare patients. The objective of this study is to compare chronic complications, re-interventions, and all-cause mortality at 2 years between patients implanted with a Micra AV leadless pacemaker and a traditional dual-chamber transvenous (DC-TV) pacemaker.
Methods And Results: Patients implanted with a Micra AV leadless pacemaker (n = 7552) or a DC-TV pacemaker (n = 110 558) in 2020 and 2021 were identified using device registration-linked Medicare administrative claims data. Competing risk models compared the unadjusted and propensity score overlap weight-adjusted complication, re-intervention, and all-cause mortality rates of Micra AV and DC-TV patients at 2 years. Micra AV patients had significantly more comorbidities (end-stage renal disease 14.9 vs. 2.0%, P < 0.0001; renal dysfunction 47.9 vs. 34.2%, P < 0.0001; diabetes 46.2 vs. 38.3%, P < 0.001; congestive heart failure 41.4 vs. 30.6%, P < 0.0001). Two years post-implant, Micra AV patients had lower complication rates [adjusted 5.3 vs. 9.6%, hazard ratio (HR): 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.61, P < 0.0001] and lower re-intervention rates (adjusted 3.5 vs. 5.6%, HR: 0.62, 95% CI 0.54-0.72, P < 0.0001) than DC-TV patients. Upgrades to cardiac resynchronization therapy were low in both groups (adjusted 1.6 vs. 1.7%, P = 0.40), as were Micra AV upgrades to a dual-chamber system (adjusted 1.4%). All-cause mortality rates remained higher in Micra AV than in DC-TV patients (unadjusted HR: 2.48, 95% CI 2.35-2.62, P < 0.0001; adjusted HR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.44-1.62, P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Patients implanted with Micra AV had lower complications and re-intervention rates at 2 years than patients implanted with a traditional DC-TV pacemaker. All-cause mortality remained higher in Micra AV patients, likely due to their higher comorbidity burden and other differences in baseline characteristics.
Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04235491.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558452 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae273 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Modular Leadless Pacing: A Case Series of Leadless Pacemaker Upgrades.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol
December 2024
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address:
A 21-year-old man, known case of the repaired congenital heart disease, developed complete atrioventricular block (AVB) one week after simultaneous bioprosthetic pulmonary and tricuspid valve replacement and atrial septal defect repair. Considering the persistence of the AVB, it was decided to implant a permanent pacemaker. After considering all available options and the issues related to the patient, it was decided to implant a leadless pacemaker (LLP).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLeadless pacemaker implantation in challenging scenarios: A case report series of patients with mechanical tricuspid valves.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J
December 2024
Division of Cardiology, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Introduction: The advancement of medical technology has introduced leadless pacemakers (LPMs) as a significant innovation in cardiac pacing, offering potential advantages over traditional ventricular transvenous pacemakers. This report explores the application of LPMs in two patients with complex valvular histories, particularly those with mechanical tricuspid valves.
Case Reports: The first case involves a 60-year-old male with a history of rheumatic heart disease and triple valve replacement who developed a high-grade AV block.
Jugular Vascular Closure and Scar Formation after Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.
Rev Cardiovasc Med
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Background: Achieving hemostasis of large bore venous access sites can be challenging and time consuming. Closure devices have proven to be superior in achieving hemostasis, reducing time to ambulation and improving patient comfort, compared to manual hemostasis techniques after femoral venous and arterial access. The closure of the jugular vein following large bore access has not been investigated in previous studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFManaging a Mental Disorder With New Technologies: TheLeadless Pacemaker in Reel's Syndrome, a Case Report.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
December 2024
Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing Unit, Pellegrini Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Reel's syndrome (RS) is an unusual cause of pacemaker lead dislodgement. We present the case of a 59-year-old female patient with Down syndrome (DS) implanted with a dual-chamber endovascular pacemaker due to symptomatic sinus node disfunction, reporting several syncopal episodes in last days and showing abnormal electrical parameters at the 2-months follow-up due to RS. The malfunctioning device was removed and an endocardial leadless pacing system was implanted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!