The Association Between Solid Fuel Use and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Sichuan, China: Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR Public Health Surveill

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Center of Biomedical Big Data, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Published: October 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates the link between using solid fuel for household energy and experiencing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) indicative of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) among older Chinese men, highlighting that over half of men aged 70 and older may be affected by BPH.
  • - Utilizing data from the West China Natural Population Cohort Study, researchers found a significant positive correlation between solid fuel use and LUTS/BPH, with participants using solid fuel nearly twice as likely to report symptoms compared to those using clean fuel.
  • - Further analysis revealed that non-smoking and non-drinking individuals had a higher odds ratio for LUTS/BPH when using solid fuels, suggesting lifestyle factors may influence the severity of symptoms associated with

Article Abstract

Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a global age-related disease. It has been reported that over half of the Chinese male population aged 70 years or older are experiencing BPH. Solid fuel, which is the major source of household air pollution, has been reportedly associated with several adverse events, including sex hormone disorders. Due to the certain relationship between sex hormone levels and prostate disease, the relationship between solid fuel use and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) suggestive of BPH (LUTS/BPH) deserves further exploration.

Objective: This study mainly aimed to investigate the association between solid fuel use and LUTS/BPH.

Methods: The data used in this study were obtained from the West China Natural Population Cohort Study. Household energy sources were assessed using questionnaires. LUTS/BPH was evaluated based on participant self-reports. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce the influence of bias and unmeasured confounders. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI of LUTS/BPH for the solid fuel group compared with the clean fuel group were calculated. We also conducted stratified analyses based on BMI, metabolic syndrome, waist to hip ratio, drinking status, smoking status, and age.

Results: A total of 5463 participants were included in this study, including 399 solid fuel users and 5064 clean fuel users. After PSM, the solid fuel group included 354 participants, while the clean fuel group included 701 participants. Solid fuel use was positively correlated with LUTS/BPH before and after PSM (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.31-2.15 and OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.35-2.44, respectively). In stratified analyses, the OR of the nonsmoking group was higher than that of the smoking group (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.56-4.20 and OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.99-2.18, respectively). Similarly, the OR of the nondrinking group was higher than that of the drinking group (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.46-4.99 and OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-2.17, respectively).

Conclusions: A positive correlation between solid fuel use and LUTS/BPH was observed. The results suggest that improving fuel structure for household cooking and other household needs can possibly help reduce the risk of LUTS/BPH.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542908PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/53673DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

solid fuel
36
fuel group
16
fuel
13
clean fuel
12
association solid
8
fuel lower
8
lower urinary
8
urinary tract
8
tract symptoms
8
benign prostatic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!