Effect of two oxygen-inhibiting agents on the surface microhardness of giomer restorative materials.

Acta Odontol Latinoam

Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Lima, Perú.

Published: September 2024

Unlabelled: Giomers are bioactive hybrid restorative materials consisting of composite resin and glass ionomer filler pre-reacted on the surface, which maintain acceptable clinical qualities over time. One of the main factors that explains this is the surface hardness that is achieved by inhibiting the oxygen layer.

Aim: To compare the effect of blue and conventional Mylar strips used as oxygen inhibiting agents on the surface microhardness of giomer restorative materials.

Materials And Method: A total 96 giomer specimens were prepared in disc-shaped molds 2 mm tall x 5 mm in diameter (ISO 4049: 2019-05). The specimens were grouped according to type of giomer: Beautifil II (BII) or Beautifil II LS (BIILS), and according to the type of Mylar strip: conventional, blue, or control group without strip. They were subsequently subjected to the Knoop (KHN) microhardness test. The database was analyzed with Stata SE v18 statistical software, and two-way ANOVA was performed.

Results: Interaction was found between the type of giomer and Mylar strip (p=0.039). Significant differences were found between surface microhardness values according to the type of giomer (0.001) and the type of Mylar strip (0.001). Beautifil II LS presented significant differences between conventional Mylar strip vs. without Mylar strip (43.58 ± 1.65 vs. 40.44 ± 2.12) and between blue Mylar strip and without Mylar strip (44.69 ± 1.75 vs. 40.44 ± 2.12). In the Bonferroni Post hoc test, a significant difference was found between Conventional Mylar Strip and without Mylar Strip (p=0.001) and Blue Mylar Strip and without Mylar Strip (p=0.001).

Conclusion: The use of blue and conventional Mylar strips inhibits the oxygen layer on the Beautifil II and Beautifil II LS giomers, endowing them with high values of surface microhardness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589962PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.37/2/99DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mylar strip
44
surface microhardness
16
conventional mylar
16
strip mylar
16
mylar
13
type giomer
12
strip
12
agents surface
8
microhardness giomer
8
giomer restorative
8

Similar Publications

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate variations in the surface roughness and gloss of different single-shade resin composites after polishing with a range of systems.

Methods: In total, 120 specimens were prepared from three different types of single-shade resin composites (supra-nanospherical-Omnichroma, nanohybrid-Charisma Diamond One, and microhybrid- Essentia Universal). The specimens were placed in distilled water and stored at 37 °C for 24 h.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: Giomers are bioactive hybrid restorative materials consisting of composite resin and glass ionomer filler pre-reacted on the surface, which maintain acceptable clinical qualities over time. One of the main factors that explains this is the surface hardness that is achieved by inhibiting the oxygen layer.

Aim: To compare the effect of blue and conventional Mylar strips used as oxygen inhibiting agents on the surface microhardness of giomer restorative materials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - This study evaluated the effects of different polishing systems on color stability, surface roughness, and gloss of various resin composites used in dental applications, involving 250 prepared specimens.
  • - After initial measurements, the specimens underwent polishing with different systems followed by immersion in coffee for 144 hours, with results analyzed to determine changes in color (ΔE), gloss (GU), and surface roughness (Ra).
  • - Significant differences were observed in color changes among materials and polishing systems, with the Crowntec composite showing the least color change and the OptiDisc group achieving the lowest surface roughness, suggesting that one polishing method alone may not provide the best outcomes for resin-based materials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the surface roughness and color stability of a single-shade composite resin after thermal cycling with different finishing and polishing systems.

Methods: A total of 91 specimens were prepared with standard molds using a single-shade resin composite Omnichroma. The specimens were randomly separated into seven groups: Control (Mylar strip only), grit (600 grit SiC abrasive paper), OneGloss, Clearfil Twist Dia, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System, EVE Diacomp Plus Twist, and OptiDisc.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Context: Long-term color stability of composite resins is one of the most important factors influencing the clinical longevity of aesthetic restorations.

Aims: This study evaluated the effect of novel reduced steps and gold standard multiple steps polishing systems of two composite resins; a nano-filled (Filtek Z350XT) versus a supra-nanofill (Palfique LX5) on their color stability after submitting to thermocycling with common beverages.

Materials And Methods: Sixty disc-shaped specimens were fabricated from both composite resins ( n = 30).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!