AI Article Synopsis

  • - The growth of electronic health record (EHR) data networks has enhanced data sharing but still leaves unmet needs for Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs, especially regarding real-world data and evidence.
  • - A mixed-methods assessment involving surveys and interviews revealed five key themes, including the need for segmentation based on resources, the importance of teamwork, trust in data quality, varying definitions of capacity building, and existing unmet needs of researchers.
  • - To better support academic research centers within the CTSA consortium, EHR data networks should focus on promoting teamwork, improving capacity building, establishing trust in data governance, and assisting in the practical use of evidence for quality improvement.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The expansion of electronic health record (EHR) data networks over the last two decades has significantly improved the accessibility and processes around data sharing. However, there lies a gap in meeting the needs of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs, particularly related to real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE).

Methods: We adopted a mixed-methods approach to construct a comprehensive needs assessment that included: (1) A Landscape Context analysis to understand the competitive environment; and (2) Customer Discovery to identify stakeholders and the value proposition related to EHR data networks. Methods included surveys, interviews, and a focus group.

Results: Thirty-two CTSA institutions contributed data for analysis. Fifty-four interviews and one focus group were conducted. The synthesis of our findings pivots around five emergent themes: (1) CTSA segmentation needs vary according to resources; (2) Team science is key for success; (3) Quality of data generates trust in the network; (4) Capacity building is defined differently by researcher career stage and CTSA existing resources; and (5) Researchers' unmet needs.

Conclusions: Based on the results, EHR data networks like ENACT that would like to meet the expectations of academic research centers within the CTSA consortium need to consider filling the gaps identified by our study: foster team science, improve workforce capacity, achieve data governance trust and efficiency of operation, and aid Learning Health Systems with validating, applying, and scaling the evidence to support quality improvement and high-value care. These findings align with the NIH NCATS Strategic Plan for Data Science.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523010PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.609DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

data networks
16
ehr data
12
data
10
electronic health
8
health record
8
customer discovery
8
interviews focus
8
team science
8
ctsa
5
national unmet
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!