Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: One of the most prevalent causes of emergency room visits is acute dyspnea. Several etiologies, including cardiac, pulmonary, metabolic, psychogenic etc… may be involved. Acute heart failure (AHF) is among the most common causes. This study aims to evaluate, in patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency departement (ED), the accuracy of a diagnostic approach combining Lung ultrasonography (LUS) and clinical assessment as compared to the traditional AHF diagnostic work-up.
Methods: This is a bi-centric cross-sectional observational study, conducted at the Emergency and Cardiology Department of both the Hedi Chaker Hospital in Sfax and the Habib Thameur Hospital in Tunis for the period extending from 01/07/2022 to 30/09/2023. The diagnostic performance of pulmonary ultrasonography was studied and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared with those of clinical examination, chest X-Ray, NT-pro -BNP and the Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) which was the reference exam.
Results: The most common cause of acute dyspnea is acute heart failure (79.3 %). LUS had a sensitivity of 94,2 % in diagnosing AHF and a specificity of 77,5 %. Its PPV and NPV were respectively 92 % and 81 %. The area under curbe (AUC) of B-Lines required for the diagnosis of interstitial pulmonary syndrome was excellent (92 %). There was a moderate significant positive correlation between the number of B-Lines and NT-Pro-BNP levels r = 0.51, P < 0.001. Also, there was a very strong significant positive relationship between the pulmonary congestion assessed by LUS and Left atrium - pressure r = 0.788, P < 0.001 CONCLUSION: LUS is an excellent test both to confirm and exclude the diagnosis of AHF in patients consulting the emergency room for acute dyspnea and therefore deserves to be performed systematically.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102910 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!