BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal hematological malignancies resulting from the proliferation of myeloid cells harboring a JAK-STAT pathway activating driver mutation. MPN management recommendations are based on the evaluation of different risks to prevent disease evolution associated events while preserving patients' quality of life. Such risks can be common across all MPN or specific to each subtype (polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), prefibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-MF), primary myelofibrosis (PMF)). MF-patients harbor the worse prognosis and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment, at the expense of a high morbi-mortality. Therefore, accurate scoring systems to estimate overall survival are crucial for MF patients' management and selection for HSCT. In PV and ET, vascular events prediction is prioritized given their higher incidence and related morbi-mortality. Finally, quality of life evaluation is important for all subtypes. To predict these risks and adapt MPN therapeutic strategies, clinical risk scores have been developed over the past decades, more recently including molecular risk factors for more accurate risk stratification. The large number of scoring systems available in combination with disease heterogeneity and the necessity to predict diverse outcomes, make it difficult for clinicians to choose the most appropriate score to evaluate their patients' risk in 2024. Here, we provide an overview of MPN disease evolution associated events incidence and conduct an exhaustive comparative review of the scoring systems currently available for each risk. Finally, we propose an algorithm for the use of these scores in clinical practice in each MPN subtype.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024025459 | DOI Listing |
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
EQT Life Sciences Partners, Amsterdam, 1071 DV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) trials report a high screening failure rate (potentially eligible trial candidates who do not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria during screening) due to multiple factors including stringent eligibility criteria. Here, we report the main reasons for screening failure in the 12-week screening phase of the ongoing evoke (NCT04777396) and evoke+ (NCT04777409) trials of semaglutide in early AD.
Method: Key inclusion criteria were age 55-85 years; mild cognitive impairment due to AD (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] global score of 0.
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
Theme Inflammation and Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Background: Alzheimer disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that is accountable for the leading case of dementia in elder people. Before, only symptomatic treatments are available for AD. Since 2021, two anti-amyloid antibodies aducanumab and lecanemab have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Accumulating evidence suggests that the presynaptic protein α-synuclein (α-syn), is involved in the pathophysiology of AD and elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The role of Natural Killer (NK) cells of the innate immune system in AD has largely been overlooked. In a murine model, depletion of NK cells augmented the accumulation of pathological α-syn.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Background: Over 15 million informal caregivers provide assistance to persons living with dementia. Despite increasing emergency department (ED) use within the population, little is known regarding the support required of older adults seeking acute care with varying degrees of cognitive impairment. Our objectives were to quantify the daily care hours that informal caregivers provide to older ED patients with diagnosed dementia, undiagnosed cognitive impairment, and intact cognition.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
Neurobehavioral Systems, Inc, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Background: Paper-and-pencil neuropsychological tests have traditionally been considered the "gold standard" for clinical testing in AD/ADRD, but they have significant limitations: They are time-consuming, costly to administer, vulnerable to examiner bias and error, and unavailable to some patients due to location, transportation challenges, and cost. Manual tests also fail to comprehensively analyze many aspects of test performance. Computerized neuropsychological test batteries have been developed to address these shortcomings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!