AI Article Synopsis
- This study explored how the spinal cord and canal moved during real-time adaptive radiotherapy for kidney cancer, focusing on MR-guided treatments from February 2022 to February 2024.
- The research involved 22 patients receiving precise doses of radiation, with MRI scans taken at three different points during treatment to assess movement.
- Findings showed minimal movement of the spinal cord, but emphasized that specific margins are needed in treatment planning to ensure patient safety amidst these movements.
Article Abstract
Background And Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the intrafractional movement of the spinal cord and spinal canal during MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) for kidney cancer.
Materials And Methods: All patients who received stereotactic MRgART for kidney cancer between February 2022 and February 2024 were included in this study. Patients received 30-42 Gy in 3-fraction MRgART for kidney cancer using the Elekta Unity, which is equipped with a linear accelerator and a 1.5 Tesla MRI. MRI scans were performed at three points during each fraction: for online planning, position verification, and posttreatment assessment. The spinal cord was contoured from the upper edge of Th12 to the medullary cone, and the spinal canal was contoured from Th12 to L3, using the first MRI. These contours were adjusted to the second and third MR images via deformable image registration, and movements were measured. Margins were determined via the formula "1.3×Σ+0.5×σ" and 95% prediction intervals.
Results: A total of 22 patients (66 fractions) were analyzed. The median interval between the first and third MRI scans were 38 minutes. The mean ± standard deviation of the spinal cord movements after this interval were -0.01 ± 0.06 for the x-axis (right-left), 0.01 ± 0.14 for the y-axis (caudal-cranial), 0.07 ± 0.05 for the z-axis (posterior-anterior), and 0.15 ± 0.08 for the 3D distance, respectively. The correlation coefficients of the 3D distance between the spinal cord and the spinal canal was high (0.92). The calculated planning organ at risk volume margin for all directions was 0.11 cm for spinal cord. The 95% prediction intervals for the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis were -0.11-0.09 cm, -0.23-0.25 cm and -0.14-0.03 cm, respectively.
Conclusions: Margins are necessary in MRgART to compensate for intrafractional movement and ensure safe treatment delivery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524472 | PMC |
| http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312032 | PLOS |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!