Discriminant Power of Smartphone-Derived Keystroke Dynamics for Mild Cognitive Impairment Compared to a Neuropsychological Screening Test: Cross-Sectional Study.

J Med Internet Res

Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Republic of Korea.

Published: October 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Conventional methods for screening mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have accuracy and practicality issues, but using smartphone interaction data offers a potential alternative.
  • This study examined how keystroke dynamics from the Neurokeys keyboard app can differentiate MCI patients from healthy controls (HCs) and compared these digital biomarkers to the Korean Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-K).
  • Results showed that patients with MCI had notably longer keystroke latency, with high sensitivity (97.9%) and specificity (96.9%) in identifying MCI, and a strong correlation between keystroke dynamics and MoCA-K scores, supporting their use as a valid screening tool.

Article Abstract

Background: Conventional neuropsychological screening tools for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) face challenges in terms of accuracy and practicality. Digital health solutions, such as unobtrusively capturing smartphone interaction data, offer a promising alternative. However, the potential of digital biomarkers as a surrogate for MCI screening remains unclear, with few comparisons between smartphone interactions and existing screening tools.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of smartphone-derived keystroke dynamics, captured via the Neurokeys keyboard app, in distinguishing patients with MCI from healthy controls (HCs). This study also compared the discriminant performance of these digital biomarkers against the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-K), which is widely used for MCI detection in clinical settings.

Methods: A total of 64 HCs and 47 patients with MCI were recruited. Over a 1-month period, participants generated 3530 typing sessions, with 2740 (77.6%) analyzed for this study. Keystroke metrics, including hold time and flight time, were extracted. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of keystroke dynamics in discriminating between HCs and patients with MCI. This study also explored the correlation between keystroke dynamics and MoCA-K scores.

Results: Patients with MCI had significantly higher keystroke latency than HCs (P<.001). In particular, latency between key presses resulted in the highest sensitivity (97.9%) and specificity (96.9%). In addition, keystroke dynamics were significantly correlated with the MoCA-K (hold time: r=-.468; P<.001; flight time: r=-.497; P<.001), further supporting the validity of these digital biomarkers.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential of smartphone-derived keystroke dynamics as an effective and ecologically valid tool for screening MCI. With higher sensitivity and specificity than the MoCA-K, particularly in measuring flight time, keystroke dynamics can serve as a noninvasive, scalable, and continuous method for early cognitive impairment detection. This novel approach could revolutionize MCI screening, offering a practical alternative to traditional tools in everyday settings.

Trial Registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20220415002; https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20220415002.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561447PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/59247DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

keystroke dynamics
16
patients mci
16
smartphone-derived keystroke
8
mild cognitive
8
cognitive impairment
8
neuropsychological screening
8
digital biomarkers
8
hcs patients
8
mci
7
keystroke
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!