Anterior-Posterior View Acquisition During Videofluoroscopy: A Survey Study Exploring Influential Factors on Speech-Language Pathologists' Practice Patterns.

J Speech Lang Hear Res

Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, NYU School of Culture Education and Human Development, New York University, NY.

Published: December 2024

Purpose: This study explored factors influencing speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') decision making surrounding anterior-posterior (AP) view inclusion practices during videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSSs) in the United States.

Method: SLPs completing VFSSs were recruited to complete an online anonymous survey. Questions represented six constructs of interest including: (a) clinician demographics, (b) practice patterns, (c) diagnostic perceptions, (d) professional influences, (e) training and education, and (f) logistical facilitators and barriers. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between construct items and likelihood of AP view inclusion.

Results: A total of 136/213 (64%) of respondents reported obtaining an AP view routinely. Facilitators of AP view inclusion were post-acute work setting ( = 3.40, = .001); perception that department practices "probably" ( = 5.65, = .006) or "definitely" align ( = 5.30, = .006) with evidence-based practice; perception the AP view has "a lot" ( = 4.17, = .025) or "a great deal" ( = 4.77, = .028) of diagnostic value; perception that their department is "definitely" supportive ( = 4.69, = .040); "moderate" ( = 4.75, = .001) or "no" ( = 7.51, < .001) equipment limitations; and radiologist support greater than "extremely unsupportive or resistant" ("somewhat unsupportive" [ = 5.74, = .041], "neutral" [ = 11.23, = .002], "somewhat supportive" [ = 13.92, = .001], or "extremely supportive" [ = 13.92, = .001]). Barriers to AP view inclusion were geographic location in the southern U.S. census region ( = 0.31, = .007), being "significantly" influenced by coworker opinions ( = 0.13, = .018), and productivity tracking ( = 0.21, = .008).

Conclusion: Environmental factors and organizational culture heavily influence AP view inclusion practices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00424DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

view inclusion
16
anterior-posterior view
8
speech-language pathologists'
8
practice patterns
8
inclusion practices
8
perception department
8
supportive" 1392
8
1392 001]
8
view
7
view acquisition
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!