AI Article Synopsis
- * Researchers measured intercanine and intermolar distances, as well as dental arch length, in a group of 28 UCLP patients and compared these measurements to a control group of 30 healthy children.
- * Results indicated that UCLP patients had significantly shorter intercanine distance and arch length than the control group, while intermolar distance showed no significant differences; the dental arch relationships improved over the years but remained reduced compared to healthy peers.
Article Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated maxillary growth and dental arch relationships at 5 and 10 years of age in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who underwent early cleft lip and palate surgery.
Methods: 28 patients with UCLP who underwent cleft lip surgery in neonatal age and cleft palate surgery at average age of 7 months without orthodontic treatment (intervention group) were measured for intercanine and intermolar distances and for dental arch length. These measurements were compared with those of 30 healthy participants in a control group. Dental arch relationships in the intervention group were evaluated by 5-YO index at 5 years and the GOSLON Yardstick score at 10 years of patients' age.
Results: Patients in the intervention group had significantly shorter mean intercanine distance and arch length than control patients at both 5 and 10 years of age (p<.001 for all). There were no significant differences in intermolar distance at both 5 (p = .945) and 10 years (p = .105) of patients' age. The average 5YO index increased from 2.46 to an average GOSLON 10-year score of 2.89 in intervention group.
Conclusion: Intercanine distance and dental arch length of patients with UCLP are significantly reduced at 5 and 10 years after early cleft lip and palate surgeries compared to the healthy population. Dental arch relationships at 5 and 10 years of patients with UCLP show comparable outcomes to those reported by other cleft centers.
Clinical Significance: This study evaluates maxillary growth in UCLP patients 5 and 10 years of age who underwent early primary lip and palate surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523859 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05067-y | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
How Much Pain Medication Do Patients Require After Posterior Iliac Crest Bone Graft to the Alveolar Cleft?
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to quantify analgesic use following alveolar cleft bone grafting (ABG) utilizing a posterior iliac crest (PIC) donor site.
Design: This is a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients that underwent ABG with PIC in a 10 month period from November 2022 to September 2023.
Setting: Tertiary care free-standing pediatric hospital.
Letter comments on 'Clinical outcomes of gingivoperiosteoplasty for unilateral cleft lip and palate performed in early childhood'.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
January 2025
Research & Evidence (RF&E), Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India. Electronic address:
Finite model analysis of different anchorage sites for bone-supported facemask application in unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
January 2025
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address:
Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the miniplate application sites in the maxilla and the applied force vector changes during skeletally supported facemask application in adolescent patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) using finite element model (FEM) analysis.
Methods: A FEM was obtained from a cone-beam computed tomography image of a 12-year-old female patient with UCLP. Miniplates were placed on 3 different sites of the maxilla; 500 g of advancement force was applied bilaterally, parallel (0°), and downward (-30°) to the occlusal plane.
Median Craniofacial Hypoplasia.
J Craniofac Surg
January 2025
Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL.
Median craniofacial hypoplasia is characterized by tissue deficiency of the midline facial structures and/or brain. Patients can present with a wide variety of facial differences that may or may not require operative intervention. Common reconstructive procedures include cleft lip and/or palate repair, rhinoplasty, and orthognathic surgery, among others.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImplementation of a program to strengthen oral hygiene in patient with cleft deformities: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trials
January 2025
INSERM, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton, RMeS, CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, UMR 1229, Nantes, 44000, France.
Background: Cleft lip and/or palate is the most common congenital orofacial deformity, affecting 1/800 births. A thorough review of the literature has shown that children with cleft have poorer oral hygiene and dental health than other children, with higher levels of caries in both temporary and permanent teeth and poorer periodontal health. Cleft patients are treated by a multidisciplinary team that aims to provide comprehensive care from pre- or post-natal diagnosis to early adulthood and the end of growth.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!