Acute effect of resistive aquatic high-intensity interval training on metabolic costs in adults.

Front Sports Act Living

Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Published: October 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to explore the metabolic responses and perceived effort of young healthy adults engaged in Aquatic High-Intensity Interval Training (AHIIT) versus resistive AHIIT in a single session.
  • Results showed significant changes in resting energy expenditure and perceived exertion in the resistive AHIIT group, but no notable differences in heart rate or oxygen consumption between the two training methods.
  • The conclusion suggests that both AHIIT and resistive AHIIT yield similar metabolic benefits, allowing for tailored training prescriptions.

Article Abstract

Background: The effects of Aquatic High-Intensity Interval Training (AHIIT) and resistive AHIIT (Resistive AHIIT) to improve metabolic responses were not yet known.

Objective: This study was to compare the metabolic responses and perceived effort in young healthy adults in a single session of AHIIT and resistive AHIIT.

Methods: 20 healthy subjects (9 females, 11 males) performed a stationary running at a matched exercise intensity prior AHIIT and resistive AHIIT [10 × 1-min bouts of stationary running at 90% maximum heart rate (HR max) separated by 1-min active recovery] to examine the metabolic and cardiometabolic outcomes. Mixed effects models were applied to analyze the effects of group, time, and the interaction between group and time on both outcomes. The level of correlations between metabolic variables was checked by Pearson's linear correlation.

Results: There are significant differences on pre and post resting energy expenditure (REE) within both AHIIT and resistive AHIIT groups ( < 0.01) respectively as well as the subjective rate of perceived exertion (RPE) ( < 0.01) within RAHIIT group. A moderate correlation found on respiratory exertional ratio (RER) and RPE in resistive AHIIT (r = 0.534). No significant differences between groups in terms of HR max, mean heart rate (HR mean), peak oxygen consumption (VO peak) and total energy expenditure (TEE) ( = 0.50,  = 0.48,  = 0.81,  = 0.59).

Conclusion: Resistive AHIIT provides comparable benefits of metabolic outcomes with AHIIT. Comparable results allowed AHIIT and resistive AHIIT prescriptions precisely.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513309PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1421281DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ahiit resistive
20
resistive ahiit
16
aquatic high-intensity
8
high-intensity interval
8
interval training
8
ahiit
8
metabolic responses
8
stationary running
8
group time
8
metabolic
5

Similar Publications

Acute effect of resistive aquatic high-intensity interval training on metabolic costs in adults.

Front Sports Act Living

October 2024

Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to explore the metabolic responses and perceived effort of young healthy adults engaged in Aquatic High-Intensity Interval Training (AHIIT) versus resistive AHIIT in a single session.
  • Results showed significant changes in resting energy expenditure and perceived exertion in the resistive AHIIT group, but no notable differences in heart rate or oxygen consumption between the two training methods.
  • The conclusion suggests that both AHIIT and resistive AHIIT yield similar metabolic benefits, allowing for tailored training prescriptions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a polygenic endocrine disorder in women of reproductive ages which will lead to infertility. This study is aimed to determine changes in levels of hyperandrogenism, hirsutism and menstrual regulation after a period of aquatic high intensity interval training (AHIIT) in women with PCOS.

Methods: Thirty patients with PCOS having age between 20 and 35 and body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m in obstetrics and gynaecology clinics in Isfahan were selected based on Rotterdam Diagnostic Criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!