Assessing health technology implementation during academic research and early-stage development: support tools for awareness and guidance: a review.

Front Digit Health

Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, TechMed Centre, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

Published: October 2024

For successful health technology innovation and implementation it is key to, in an early phase, understand the problem and whether a proposed innovation is the best way to solve the problem. This review performed an initial exploration of published tools that support innovators in academic research and early stage development with awareness and guidance along the end-to-end process of development, evaluation and implementation of health technology innovations. Tools were identified from scientific literature as well as in grey literature by non-systematic searches in public research databases and search engines, and based on expert referral. A total number of 14 tools were included. Tools were classified as either readiness level tool ( = 6), questionnaire/checklist tool ( = 5) or guidance tool ( = 3). A qualitative analysis of the tools identified 5 key domains, 5 innovation phases and 3 implementation principles. All tools were mapped for (partially) addressing the identified domains, phases, and principles. The present review provides awareness of available tools and of important aspects of health technology innovation and implementation (vs. non-technological or non-health related technological innovations). Considerations for tool selection include for example the purpose of use (awareness or guidance) and the type of health technology innovation. Considerations for novel tool development include the specific challenges in academic and early stage development settings, the translation of implementation to early innovation phases, and the importance of multi-disciplinary strategic decision-making. A remaining attention point for future studies is the validation and effectiveness of (self-assessment) tools, especially in the context of support preferences and available support alternatives.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513387PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1386998DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health technology
20
awareness guidance
12
technology innovation
12
tools
9
innovation implementation
8
academic early
8
early stage
8
stage development
8
tools identified
8
innovation phases
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!