Background: Variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, many patients rely on pre-existing immunity by original vaccines or prior infections.

Aim: To assess whether such immunity sufficiently combats the highly immune-evasive SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant.

Methods: Utilising two longitudinal cohorts, we evaluated immunity against JN.1 induced by original vaccines (IBD: n = 98; healthy: n = 48), omicron breakthrough infection (IBD: n = 55; healthy: n = 57) or XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines (IBD: n = 18). Neutralisation and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and JN.1 were assessed using multiplex immunoassays. Study outcomes were wild-type and JN.1 neutralisation following three doses of original mRNA vaccines, stratified by immunosuppressive therapy (primary outcome), and JN.1 neutralisation following third-dose breakthrough infection or a fourth dose of XBB.1.5-adapted mRNA vaccines (secondary outcomes).

Results: Following original vaccines, JN.1 neutralisation was lower than wild-type neutralisation in all study groups (healthy, anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF; each p < 0.001); most individuals lacked JN.1 neutralisation (healthy: 97.9%; anti-TNF: 98.3% and non-anti-TNF: 92.3%). Confounder-adjusted multivariable modelling strongly associated anti-TNF therapy with low levels of anti-JN.1-RBD IgG (fold-change 0.48 [95% CI 0.39-0.59]). JN.1 neutralisation was similar in patients with or without breakthrough infection (anti-TNF, non-anti-TNF; each p > 0.05); neutralisation failure was 100% despite breakthrough infection. XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines enhanced JN.1 neutralisation (p < 0.001) and reduced neutralisation failure rates in patients with IBD (94.4% pre-vaccination vs. 44.4% post-vaccination; p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Only variant-adapted vaccines protect against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Patients with IBD and healthy individuals without recent vaccination may lack protection against the JN.1 subvariant KP.3 which causes current COVID-19 surges.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.18349DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jn1 neutralisation
16
mrna vaccines
12
sars-cov-2 jn1
12
original vaccines
12
breakthrough infection
12
vaccines
9
neutralisation
8
jn1
8
patients inflammatory
8
inflammatory bowel
8

Similar Publications

Humoral response superiority of the monovalent XBB.1.5 over the bivalent BA.1 and BA.5 mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Vaccine

September 2024

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Israel; The Sheba Pandemic Preparedness Research Institute (SPRI), Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.

JN.1, the dominating SARS-CoV-2 variant, is antigenically distinct from ancestral BA.1, BA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Neutralizing antibody response to XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, FL.1.5.1, and JN.1 six months after the BNT162b2 bivalent booster.

Int J Infect Dis

June 2024

Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Research Unit, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium; Qualiblood s.a., Research and Development Department, Namur, Belgium; Department of Biological Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand, Hôpital Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Objectives: An increase evasion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus toward vaccination strategies and natural immunity has been rapidly described notably because of the mutations in the spike receptor binding domain and the N-terminal domain.

Methods: Participants of the CRO-VAX HCP study who received the bivalent booster were followed up at 6 months. A pseudovirus-neutralization test was used to assess the neutralization potency of antibodies against D614G, Delta, BA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The current study investigates the effect of altering the point of force application (PFA) from the rearfoot towards the fore of the foot on the metabolic energy consumption and the influence of transitioning to this technique over a short or a longer timeframe. The participants were randomly assigned into two experimental and one control group: a short-term intervention group (STI, =17; two training sessions), a long-term intervention group (LTI, =10; 14-week gradual transition) and a control group (CG, =11). Data were collected at two running velocities (2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!