https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=39468752&retmode=xml&tool=Litmetric&email=readroberts32@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09 3946875220241029
1460-20912024Oct28The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapyJ Antimicrob ChemotherEfficacy of meropenem against ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC-31, KPC-33, KPC-90, KPC-106 and KPC-114.dkae38910.1093/jac/dkae389Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC variants conferring resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam often remain susceptible to meropenem, suggesting a potential therapeutic use of this antibiotic.In this study, the efficacy of clinically relevant concentrations of meropenem was evaluated against high-risk clones of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant K. pneumoniae strains producing KPC variants, in a tandem in vitro time-kill/in vivo Galleria mellonella survival model.In vitro/in vivo efficacy of meropenem against ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant K. pneumoniae of CG16, CG25 and CG258, producing KPC-31, KPC-33, KPC-90, KPC-106 and KPC-114 variants, was evaluated using EUCAST dosing recommendation adjusted to the G. mellonella model. For in vivo assays, untreated, meropenem (40 mg/kg × 1)-treated and ceftazidime-avibactam (40 mg/kg ceftazidime-10 mg/kg avibactam × 1)-treated groups were established, with 60 larvae per group. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, univariate Cox regression and hazard ratios (HR) were used to assess treatment effects (P < 0.05).For all KPC-variant producers, time-kill assays showed >3 log-kills reduction (-6.91 ± 1.28 SD) after 6 h interaction when exposed to 8-32 mg/L meropenem MIC values (i.e.  ≥  × 4 MIC). In the assessment of in vivo efficacy of meropenem, at the 4-day follow-up, mortality rates were 96.7% (untreated), 83.3% (ceftazidime-avibactam-treated) and 13.3% (meropenem-treated) (P < 0.05). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed significantly lower risk in the meropenem group compared to untreated group [HR 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01-0.05)].These pre-clinical results might support use of meropenem as a potential alternative for treatment of infections due to KPC-variant producers displaying in vitro susceptibility to meropenem.© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.ParionaJesus G MJGM0000-0001-9174-0749Department of Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.One Health Brazilian Resistance Project (OneBR), São Paulo, Brazil.Vásquez-PonceFelipeF0000-0002-9447-8325Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.One Health Brazilian Resistance Project (OneBR), São Paulo, Brazil.ParionaEva M MEMM0000-0001-9026-8366Unidad de Investigación de Enfermedades Emergentes y Cambio Climático, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.Sousa-CarmoRubens RRR0000-0001-7135-7531Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.One Health Brazilian Resistance Project (OneBR), São Paulo, Brazil.Martins-GonçalvesThaisT0000-0003-4320-3089Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.One Health Brazilian Resistance Project (OneBR), São Paulo, Brazil.BecerraJohanaJ0000-0002-9813-1556Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.One Health Brazilian Resistance Project (OneBR), São Paulo, Brazil.Antimicrobial Resistance Institute of São Paulo (ARIES), São Paulo, Brazil.de LimaAline VAV0000-0001-6325-1446Department of Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.QueirogaGustavoG0000-0001-7359-3095Department of Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.One Health Brazilian Resistance Project (OneBR), São Paulo, Brazil.SampaioJorge L MJLM0000-0001-7789-3028Department of Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.LincopanNiltonN0000-0003-0161-5800Department of Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.One Health Brazilian Resistance Project (OneBR), São Paulo, Brazil.Antimicrobial Resistance Institute of São Paulo (ARIES), São Paulo, Brazil.eng314336/2021-4Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoJournal Article20241028
EnglandJ Antimicrob Chemother75136170305-7453IM
202471720241012202410296232024102962320241029213aheadofprint3946875210.1093/jac/dkae3897848485