Static reanimation of the paralyzed face using non-absorbable polypropylene mesh.

<br><b>Introduction:</b> There are 2 methods for correcting facial deformities resulting from facial nerve paralysis - dynamic and static. Although dynamic methods are the standard approach in selected patient groups, static facial suspension using synthetic material provides a minimally invasive alternative for those who do not qualify for them.</br> <br><b>Aim:<b> Presenting experiences with the use of non-absorbable polypropylene mesh in the Department of Plastic Surgery in Polanica-Zdrój and reviewing the literature related to static facial reanimation methods.</br> <br><b>Materials and methods:</b> Fourteen patients underwent static facial tissue suspension using non-absorbable polypropylene mesh and 12 patients underwent surgery using classical autologous tissue techniques between 2019 and 2023. Indications for surgical treatment were analyzed, and preliminary results of treatment using both methods were compared.</br> <br><b>Results:</b> Compared to autologous tissue methods, surgeries using synthetic mesh were associated with shorter hospitalization times. No long-term postoperative complications were observed in any patient. There were no differences in treatment outcomes between autologous tissue and synthetic mesh techniques, and all patients assessed the outcome as favorable.</br> <br><b>Discussion:</b> Treatment of facial nerve paralysis sequelae using static techniques should be considered for patients not qualifying for surgery with dynamic methods and/or not consenting to such procedures. Using synthetic material as an alternative to autologous material reduces surgical time and avoids donor-site injuries and prolonged recovery.</br> <br><b>Conclusions:</b> Facial suspension with synthetic material is an effective, low-risk procedure for static correction of facial nerve paralysis sequelae.</br> <br><b>Study significance:</b> Emphasizing the importance of static methods in facial reanimation.</br>.