Distinguishing expectation and attention effects in processing temporal patterns of visual input.

Brain Cogn

Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explored how the brain forms expectations based on stimulus patterns, distinguishing between implicit expectations (e.g., from the stimuli themselves) and explicit expectations (e.g., from task demands).
  • Using EEG, researchers found that when visual patterns were relevant to a task, they triggered distinct neural responses, but irrelevant patterns did not elicit the same neural activation.
  • The findings suggest that attentional control driven by the task can separate from expectations set by stimuli, highlighting the importance of task relevance in managing attention and responses to sensory information.

Article Abstract

The current study investigated how the brain sets up expectations from stimulus regularities by evaluating the neural responses to expectations driven implicitly (by the stimuli themselves) and explicitly (by task demands). How the brain uses prior information to create expectations and what role attention plays in forming or holding predictions to efficiently respond to incoming sensory information is still debated. We presented temporal patterns of visual input while recording EEG under two different task conditions. When the patterns were task-relevant and pattern recognition was required to perform the button press task, three different event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were elicited, each reflecting a different aspect of pattern expectation. In contrast, when the patterns were task-irrelevant, none of the neural indicators of pattern recognition or pattern violation detection were observed to the same temporally structured sequences. Thus, results revealed a clear distinction between expectation and attention that was prompted by task requirements. These results provide complementary pieces of evidence that implicit exposure to a stimulus pattern may not be sufficient to drive neural effects of expectations that lead to predictive error responses. Task-driven attentional control can dissociate from stimulus-driven expectations, to effectively minimize distracting information and maximize attentional regulation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645222PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106228DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

expectation attention
8
temporal patterns
8
patterns visual
8
visual input
8
pattern recognition
8
expectations
5
pattern
5
distinguishing expectation
4
attention effects
4
effects processing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!