AI Article Synopsis

  • Fifty patients were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving standard high oxygen levels and the other gradually increasing oxygen levels.
  • Results showed no significant difference in markers of myocardial injury between the groups, indicating that while gradual reperfusion is safe, it does not reduce reperfusion injury compared to the standard method.

Article Abstract

: The majority of cardiac surgical procedures are performed using cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia-induced cardiac arrest. Cardiac arrest and reperfusion may lead to ischemia-reperfusion injury of the myocardium. The aim of this study was to investigate whether gradual reperfusion with a slow increase in oxygen partial pressure leads to a reduction in reperfusion injury. : Fifty patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were included in this prospective randomized study. Patients in the hyperoxemic (control) group received conventional reoxygenation (paO 250-300 mmHg). Patients in the normoxemic (study) group received gradual reoxygenation (1st-minute venous blood with paO 30-40 mmHg, 2nd-minute arterial blood with paO 100-150 mmHg). Periprocedural blood samples were taken serially, and markers of myocardial injury were analyzed. In addition, the influence of gradual reoxygenation on hemodynamics, inflammation, and the overall perioperative course was evaluated. : There was a trend toward higher CK levels in the hyperoxemia group without statistical significance; however, CK-MB and troponin T levels did not show any statistical difference between the two groups. Potassium concentrations in the coronary sinus were significantly higher in the hyperoxemia group at 3 and 8 min after opening of the aortic cross-clamp (6.88 ± 0.87 mmol/L vs. 6.30 ± 0.91 mmol/L and 5.87 ± 0.73 mmol/L vs. 5.43 ± 0.42 mmol/L, respectively; = 0.03 and = 0.02). All other measurements did not show a statistical difference between the two groups. : The use of gradual reperfusion in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac arrest is safe. However, it does not reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury compared to standard hyperoxemic reperfusion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11509625PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101564DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac arrest
16
gradual reperfusion
12
cardioplegia-induced cardiac
8
cardiopulmonary bypass
8
ischemia-reperfusion injury
8
cardiac surgery
8
group received
8
gradual reoxygenation
8
blood pao
8
hyperoxemia group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!