Background: Firearm violence is a significant public health issue. However, it is unclear if there is an association between the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the intent of both fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries, and if these associations are modified by community race and ethnic composition. This study examines the association between community-level social vulnerability and firearm injury incidence in North Carolina (NC) using 2021-2022 emergency medical services (EMS) data. Additionally, it investigates how these associations vary by the intent of injury (assault, self-inflicted, and unintentional), and whether they are modified by community racial/ethnic composition.
Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized NC EMS data, capturing firearm incidents from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022. The SVI from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was used to assess community-level vulnerability. The SVI's racial/ethnic minority status component was removed for stratification analysis. Firearm injury rates were calculated per 100,000 population, and negative binomial regression models were used to estimate Incidence Rate Ratios (IRRs) for different SVI levels and intents of firearm injuries.
Results: During the study period, we identified 7,250 EMS encounters at non-healthcare locations related to firearm injuries, encompassing 2,648 NC census tracts. Assault was the leading cause of firearm injuries (n = 3,799), followed by self-inflicted (n = 1,498), and unintentional injuries (n = 722). High-SVI communities had significantly higher rates of firearm injuries compared to low-SVI communities, particularly for assault-related injuries. When the minority status component was excluded from SVI, racial/ethnic minority status emerged as a significant modifier, with higher rates of firearm injuries being observed in communities with larger racial/ethnic minority populations.
Conclusion: Community-level social vulnerability is significantly associated with firearm injury incidence, with the effect being more pronounced in racial/ethnic minority communities. These findings underscore the need for targeted public health interventions that address underlying social determinants of health (e.g., access to education) to reduce firearm violence. Future research should further explore the intersection of social vulnerability and racial/ethnic composition to develop effective prevention strategies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515109 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00539-9 | DOI Listing |
Am J Emerg Med
January 2025
ESO, Inc, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Objective: To describe changes in patient and encounter characteristics among Emergency Medical Services (EMS) responses for patients ages 0-19 with firearm-related injuries.
Methods: This retrospective national analysis used data from the 2018-2022 ESO Data Collaborative and included all 9-1-1 records for patients ages 0-19 years with documentation of firearm-related injuries. Percent changes are reported; annual changes were evaluated using a non-parametric test of trend.
Diagnostics (Basel)
December 2024
Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, "Kore" University of Enna, 94100 Enna, Italy.
: Firearm wounds tend to have a precise pattern. Despite this, real-world case presentations can present uncertain elements, sometimes deviating from what is considered standard, and present uncommon features that are difficult for forensic pathologists and ballistic experts to explain. : A retrospective analysis of autopsy reports from the Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Catania, covering 2019-2023, included 348 judicial inspections and 378 autopsies performed as part of the institute's overall activities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJAMA Health Forum
January 2025
Department of Emergency Medicine and Comprehensive Injury Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Prev Sci
January 2025
Oregon Research Institute, 3800 Sports Way, Springfield, OR, 97477, USA.
This paper reviews evidence about the impact of marketing on ill health. We summarize evidence that marketing practices in six industries (tobacco, alcohol, pharmaceutical, processed food, firearm, and fossil fuel) are causal influences on the occurrence of injury, disease, and premature death. For each industry, we provide a brief overview on the extent of harmful marketing, efforts from each industry to obscure or otherwise conceal the impact of their marketing strategies, and efforts to counter the impact of harmful marketing in these industries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!