Background: Oronasal masks are used widely for treating OSA with CPAP. However, oronasal CPAP is associated with lower effectiveness and lower adherence than nasal CPAP.
Research Question: What is the impact of oral route and lateral position in patients well adapted to oronasal CPAP? Can these patients be switched to nasal CPAP?
Study Design And Methods: Patients with OSA receiving oronasal CPAP underwent two CPAP polysomnography titrations in random order using an oronasal mask with two independent sealed compartments connected to two separate pneumotachographs. One study was performed with the nasal and oral compartments opened and the other study was performed with only the oral compartment opened. CPAP titration was carried out in the supine and lateral positions. Finally, the patients were offered a nasal mask. A third polysomnography test was performed using nasal CPAP.
Results: Twenty patients with OSA (baseline apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], 52 ± 21 events/h) adapted to oronasal CPAP were studied. Most patients (75%) were oronasal breathers with optimal CPAP. Oral CPAP was less effective to treat OSA than oronasal CPAP, evidenced by a higher residual AHI (median, 2 [interquartile range (IQR), 1-6.0] vs 12.5 [IQR, 1.8-28.3); P = .003), despite a significantly higher CPAP level (median, 10 cm HO [IQR, 9-10 cm HO] vs 11 cm HO [IQR, 10-12 cm HO]; P = .003). The residual AHI was significantly lower in the lateral position for both oronasal and oral CPAP. Finally, patients (75%) agreed to change and preferred to continue using a nasal mask, which resulted in lower CPAP and better OSA control.
Interpretation: Our results indicate that the effectiveness of oronasal CPAP to abolish OSA is decreased significantly when patients are required to breathe exclusively through the mouth. Oronasal CPAP efficacy is significantly better in the lateral position. The transition to nasal mask results in higher CPAP effectiveness to treat OSA.
Clinical Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05272761; URL: www.
Clinicaltrials: gov.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.023 | DOI Listing |
Chest
October 2024
Laboratorio do Sono, Divisão de Pneumologia, Instituto do Coracao, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address:
Background: Oronasal masks are used widely for treating OSA with CPAP. However, oronasal CPAP is associated with lower effectiveness and lower adherence than nasal CPAP.
Research Question: What is the impact of oral route and lateral position in patients well adapted to oronasal CPAP? Can these patients be switched to nasal CPAP?
Study Design And Methods: Patients with OSA receiving oronasal CPAP underwent two CPAP polysomnography titrations in random order using an oronasal mask with two independent sealed compartments connected to two separate pneumotachographs.
Sleep Breath
December 2024
Department of Respiratory Pathophysiology and Rehabilitation, Monaldi Hospital, A.O. dei, Colli - 80131, Naples, Italy.
Respir Res
September 2024
Groupe Adène, Montpellier, France.
Background: Over the past three decades, our understanding of sleep apnea in women has advanced, revealing disparities in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment compared to men. However, no real-life study to date has explored the relationship between mask-related side effects (MRSEs) and gender in the context of long-term CPAP.
Methods: The InterfaceVent-CPAP study is a prospective real-life cross-sectional study conducted in an apneic adult cohort undergoing at least 3 months of CPAP with unrestricted mask-access (34 different masks, no gender specific mask series).
Sleep Breath
October 2024
Head of Pneumonology, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Respir Med Res
June 2024
Dept of Pneumology and Intensive Care Unit, Reference Centre for Rare Lung Diseases, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France. Electronic address:
Background: Nasal mask (NM) and oronasal masks (OM) can be used to provide noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Recent studies suggested that OM is the most used interface and that there is no difference in efficacy or in tolerance between OM and NM for chronic use. However, studies focusing on video laryngoscopy underlined the impact of OM in residual upper airway obstruction (UAO) under NIV.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!