Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training of a machine learning (ML) model across multiple parties, facilitating the preservation of users' and institutions' privacy by maintaining data stored locally. Instead of centralizing raw data, FL exchanges locally refined model parameters to build a global model incrementally. While FL is more compliant with emerging regulations such as the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), ensuring the right to be forgotten in this context-allowing FL participants to remove their data contributions from the learned model-remains unclear. In addition, it is recognized that malicious clients may inject backdoors into the global model through updates, e.g., to generate mispredictions on specially crafted data examples. Consequently, there is the need for mechanisms that can guarantee individuals the possibility to remove their data and erase malicious contributions even after aggregation, without compromising the already acquired "good" knowledge. This highlights the necessity for novel federated unlearning (FU) algorithms, which can efficiently remove specific clients' contributions without full model retraining. This article provides background concepts, empirical evidence, and practical guidelines to design/implement efficient FU schemes. This study includes a detailed analysis of the metrics for evaluating unlearning in FL and presents an in-depth literature review categorizing state-of-the-art FU contributions under a novel taxonomy. Finally, we outline the most relevant and still open technical challenges, by identifying the most promising research directions in the field.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3478334 | DOI Listing |
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst
October 2024
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training of a machine learning (ML) model across multiple parties, facilitating the preservation of users' and institutions' privacy by maintaining data stored locally. Instead of centralizing raw data, FL exchanges locally refined model parameters to build a global model incrementally. While FL is more compliant with emerging regulations such as the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), ensuring the right to be forgotten in this context-allowing FL participants to remove their data contributions from the learned model-remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Imaging (Bellingham)
September 2024
University of Calgary, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Purpose: Distributed learning is widely used to comply with data-sharing regulations and access diverse datasets for training machine learning (ML) models. The traveling model (TM) is a distributed learning approach that sequentially trains with data from one center at a time, which is especially advantageous when dealing with limited local datasets. However, a critical concern emerges when centers utilize different scanners for data acquisition, which could potentially lead models to exploit these differences as shortcuts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeural Netw
December 2024
Department of Computer Engineering, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address:
Federated unlearning (FUL) is a promising solution for removing negative influences from the global model. However, ensuring the reliability of local models in FL systems remains challenging. Existing FUL studies mainly focus on eliminating bad data influences and neglecting scenarios where other factors, such as adversarial attacks and communication constraints, also contribute to negative influences that require mitigation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHippocampus
May 2024
Laboratório de Neurobiologia da Memória, Departamento de Biofísica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Diagnostics (Basel)
September 2023
Clinical Emergency Hospital "Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu", 700309 Iasi, Romania.
Background: The study investigated whether three deep-learning models, namely, the CNN_model (trained from scratch), the TL_model (transfer learning), and the FT_model (fine-tuning), could predict the early response of brain metastases (BM) to radiosurgery using a minimal pre-processing of the MRI images. The dataset consisted of 19 BM patients who underwent stereotactic-radiosurgery (SRS) within 3 months. The images used included axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences and high-resolution contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE T1w) sequences from the tumor center.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!