AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the differences in cardiovascular biomarkers between patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA), and employs machine learning models for diagnosis.
  • It specifically evaluates the diagnostic value of changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) levels in patients suspected of having NSTEMI.
  • Results show that hs-cTnI levels and other cardiac markers are significantly higher in NSTEMI patients, and the optimal diagnostic model using hs-cTnI measurements achieved high predictive accuracy, emphasizing its role in improving NSTEMI diagnosis.

Article Abstract

Background: This study demonstrates differences in the distribution of multiple cardiovascular biomarkers between non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) patients. Diagnostic machine learning predictive models measured at the time of admission and 1/2 h post-admission, achieving competitive diagnostic predictive results.

Objective: This study aims to explore the diagnostic value of changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) levels in patients with suspected NSTEMI.

Methods: A total of 267 patients presented with chest pain, requiring confirmation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subtypes (NSTEMI vs. UA). Hs-cTnI and other cardiac markers, such as creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and Myoglobin (Myo), were analyzed. Machine learning techniques were employed to assess the application of hs-cTnI level changes in the clinical diagnosis of NSTEMI.

Results: Levels of CK-MB, Myo, hs-cTnI measured at admission, hs-cTnI measured 1-2 h after admission, and NT-proBNP in NSTEMI patients were significantly higher than those in UA patients ( < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between hs-cTnI and CK-MB, as well as Myo (R = 0.72, R = 0.51, R = 0.60). The optimal diagnostic model, Hybiome_1/2h, demonstrated an F1-Score of 0.74, an AUROC of 0.96, and an AP of 0.89.

Conclusions: This study confirms the significant value of hs-cTnI as a sensitive marker of myocardial injury in the diagnosis of NSTEMI. Continuous monitoring of hs-cTnI levels enhances the accuracy of distinguishing NSTEMI from UA. The models indicate that the Hybiome hs-cTnI assays perform comparably well to the Beckman assays in predicting NSTEMI. Moreover, incorporating hs-cTnI measurements taken 1-2 h post-admission significantly enhances the model's effectiveness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506866PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14202322DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

machine learning
12
hs-ctni
11
diagnostic model
8
nstemi hs-ctni
8
multiple cardiovascular
8
cardiovascular biomarkers
8
hs-ctni levels
8
hs-ctni measured
8
nstemi
7
diagnostic
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!