A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Clinical usefulness of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1b colorectal carcinomas ≤20 mm to ensure adequate vertical margins. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess endoscopic resection methods for cT1b colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) measuring ≤20 mm, focusing on achieving sufficient vertical margins (VMs).
  • Researchers evaluated 128 patients, categorizing tumor lifting conditions into types A (soft dome), B (hard trapezoid), and non-lifting, where they found that all non-lifting tumors required hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to ensure VMs of at least 500 µm.
  • The results indicated that hybrid ESD is more effective for type B tumors, producing significantly better VM outcomes compared to endoscopic mucosal resection.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate endoscopic resection strategies for cT1b colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) ≤20 mm to determine strategies that enable adequate vertical margins (VMs).

Methods: We enrolled 128 consecutive patients with cT1b colorectal carcinomas ≤20 mm resected by endoscopic mucosal resection or hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Tumor lifting conditions after submucosal injection were classified into type A (lifting, soft dome-like), type B (lifting, hard trapezoid-like), and non-lifting (positive non-lifting sign). Predictors of positive VMs (VM 1) and adequate VMs were identified.

Results: All non-lifting tumors were resected by hybrid ESD and VMs were ≥500 µm. Vertical margin 1 tumors were only found in the endoscopic mucosal resection group, in which, the proportion of type B tumors with VM 1 was significantly higher than that of tumors with negative VMs ( < 0.01). Type A tumors showed no significant between-group differences. Among type B tumors, the proportion of VMs ≥500 µm was significantly higher ( < 0.01) and the VM distance was significantly longer ( < 0.01) in the hybrid ESD group than in the endoscopic mucosal resection group.

Conclusions: Hybrid ESD can be selected for type B tumors to ensure adequate VMs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499709PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70030DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colorectal carcinomas
12
hybrid endoscopic
8
endoscopic submucosal
8
submucosal dissection
8
carcinomas ≤20
8
adequate vertical
8
vertical margins
8
ct1b colorectal
8
endoscopic mucosal
8
type lifting
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!