A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Background phase induced steady-state effects in velocity quantification using phase-contrast MRI. | LitMetric

Background phase induced steady-state effects in velocity quantification using phase-contrast MRI.

Magn Reson Med

Magnetic Resonance, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany.

Published: October 2024

Purpose: Flow quantification using phase-contrast (PC) MRI is based on steady-state gradient echo (GRE) sequences and is hampered by spatially varying background phase offsets. The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of steady-state disruptions during PC-MRI GRE sequences on these background phases. Based on these findings, a specific sequence and timing is suggested, and caution is expressed when using typical correction algorithms.

Methods: Steady-state responses in stationary tissue were investigated in different prospectively triggered through-plane phase-contrast MRI sequence. Different spoiling methods (gradient spoiling/FISP versus gradient+RF spoiling/FLASH) and interleaving of flow encoding gradients (every TR vs. every ECG cycle) were investigated using simulations, in phantoms and in vivo. Additionally, the effect of relaxation times on the phase offsets was simulated and measured. The impact on image- and phantom-based background phase correction was studied.

Results: Good agreement between simulation and phantom measurements were observed. Different sequences lead to different spatiotemporal and tissue dependent background phases. Average flow rates in the popliteal artery were over- and underestimated for ECG-interleaved and TR-interleaved FISP acquisitions compared to FLASH, respectively.

Conclusion: Background phase measurements are influenced by steady-state effects leading to potentially false background phase quantification. Current background phase correction methods cannot correct for the disturbance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30358DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

background phase
24
phase-contrast mri
12
background
8
steady-state effects
8
quantification phase-contrast
8
gre sequences
8
phase offsets
8
background phases
8
phase correction
8
phase
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!