A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Outcomes of the American Board of Dermatology focused Practice Improvement program 2016-2023. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Board-certified dermatologists have engaged in a practice improvement program (fPI) from 2016 to 2023, completing 19,143 modules that addressed various care gaps.
  • A significant majority (99%) of participants found these modules relevant, with popular topics including acne and lab monitoring needing enhancement.
  • Many dermatologists reported positive impacts on patient care, including improved outcomes in 27.7% of instances, and a high recommendation rate for the program among peers (97.3%).

Article Abstract

Background: Board-certified dermatologists experience diverse practice gaps.

Objective: Identify the top self-selected focused Practice Improvement (fPI) modules completed over time by board-certified dermatologists during the program's first 8 years.

Methods: Cohort study of dermatologists certified by the American Board of Dermatology (ABD) completing fPI modules from 2016 to 2023. This descriptive analysis reports modules completed by topic, subspecialty, relevance, and self-reported changes to subsequent patient care related to modules.

Results: About 19,143 fPI modules were completed by 7378 unique ABD diplomates, representing 48.8% of all current ABD-certified dermatologists (n = 15,118). Modules were rated relevant by 18,917 participants (99%). Care gaps requiring improvement efforts and performance remeasurement occurred in 2919 (15.2%) completed modules. Acne and medication-related laboratory monitoring were popular topics requiring improvement. Diplomates reported care improvements resulting from completing modules in 8397 instances (43.9%), and improved patient outcomes in at least one patient 5310 times (27.7%). Finally, diplomates stated they would recommend fPI modules to peers 18,633 (97.3%) times.

Limitations: Dermatologists who started but did not complete modules would not have rated the module. Attribution bias on care impact is possible and potentially overestimated.

Conclusion: The ABD fPI program is helping board-certified dermatologists identify and improve gaps in care with reported patient outcome improvements.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.071DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fpi modules
16
board-certified dermatologists
12
modules completed
12
modules
9
american board
8
board dermatology
8
focused practice
8
practice improvement
8
modules rated
8
requiring improvement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!