AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to explore the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival rates in patients diagnosed with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS).
  • A systematic review of 16 studies, involving nearly 5,700 patients, found that adjuvant chemotherapy was used by about 38.5% of patients but showed no significant difference in overall survival or disease-free survival compared to those who received observation only.
  • Despite a variety of chemotherapy regimens being assessed, including drugs like doxorubicin and cisplatin, results indicated no clear survival advantage from using adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.

Article Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes in patients with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS).

Methods: This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis through December 31, 2023 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024504776) investigated studies that examined survival outcomes in patients with stage I uLMS using 4 public search engines (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). Two investigators searched the studies independently, and survival outcomes (overall survival [OS] and disease-free survival [DFS]) were compared between the adjuvant chemotherapy and observation groups. Utilization rate of adjuvant chemotherapy and the regimens used were also assessed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the two treatment groups were evaluated using ImageJ software.

Results: From 1988 to 2022, 16 eligible studies including a total of 5690 patients met the inclusion criteria and evaluated the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes in patients with stage I uLMS. Adjuvant chemotherapy was utilized in 38.5 % of patients (range, 14.8 % to 70.0 %). Eight studies from 2017 to 2022 compared the survival outcomes between adjuvant chemotherapy and observation. OS was comparable between the two groups in both unadjusted (n = 6, hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.35, P = 0.88) and adjusted (n = 4, HR 0.90, 95 %CI 0.56-1.43, P = 0.65) pooled analyses. DFS was also similar between adjuvant chemotherapy and observation in both unadjusted (n = 4, HR 0.78, 95 %CI 0.53-1.13, P = 0.18) and adjusted (n = 2, HR 1.14, 95 %CI 0.67-1.94, P = 0.64) pooled analyses. Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens utilized included doxorubicin, ifosfamide, cisplatin, gemcitabine, and docetaxel as monotherapies or combination therapies.

Conclusions: In this contemporaneous systematic review and meta-analysis, less than 40 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I uLMS and adjuvant chemotherapy which was not associated with improved survival. These results support the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines that recommends de-escalating adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I uLMS after complete resection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adjuvant chemotherapy
44
survival outcomes
20
stage ulms
16
adjuvant
12
systematic review
12
review meta-analysis
12
outcomes patients
12
patients stage
12
chemotherapy observation
12
chemotherapy
11

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!