A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS). | LitMetric

Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS).

JSLS

Department of OB/GYN, BronxCare Health System, Bronx, New York. (Drs. Wang, Uzianbaeva, Hughes, and Mehdizadeh).

Published: October 2024

Background And Objective: When the uterus is or more than 18 to 20 weeks in size, laparotomy but not minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is commonly performed for hysterectomy. It is, however, acknowledged that MIS carries numerous benefits to patients compared to laparotomy. The uterine size should therefore not be an excluding factor for MIS. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of MIS for hysterectomy for large uterus and explain specific techniques employed.

Methods: Data from 73 laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy cases were collected. Cases were divided in two groups based on uterine weight (≥500 g vs <500 g). Estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of hospital stays, and perioperative complications were compared between the groups.

Results: The average specimen weight in two groups was 244 ± 102.75 g vs 903 ± 438.18 g ( < .01). There was no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups. Only 3 patients were hospitalized for more than one day. There were no instances of conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion. There was a statistically significant difference in the EBL (78.19 ± 43.8 ml vs 127.88 ± 69.76 ml,  < .01) and operative time (180.68 ± 48.36 vs 228.85 ± 53.04 minutes,  < .01) between the two groups. There were two cases of bladder laceration in the group with uterine weight exceeding 500 g.

Conclusion: With advanced surgical skills and the adoption of specific techniques, hysterectomy for large uterus can be performed safely and efficiently by MIS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495860PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hysterectomy large
8
large uterus
8
minimally invasive
8
invasive surgery
8
surgery mis
8
mis
5
hysterectomy
4
uterus minimally
4
mis background
4
background objective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!