Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and misoprostol together (intervention) compared to misoprostol alone (comparator) for the resolution of miscarriage and intrauterine fetal death.
Data Sources: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology through July 2024 that evaluated the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and misoprostol together compared to misoprostol alone for the resolution of miscarriage and intrauterine fetal death through July 2024.
Study Selection And Data Extraction: Primary endpoints were overall delivery success, 24-hour delivery success, and incidence of safety outcomes. A -value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant, and heterogeneity was reported as the I value.
Data Synthesis: Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Overall delivery success was higher in the intervention group (0.73 [CI 0.64-0.82], < 0.01). Twenty-four-hour delivery rate was higher (1.54 [CI 1.32-1.77], = 0.06), and a shorter time to delivery interval (9.22-18.78 vs 15.47-37.1 hours) was observed in the intervention group. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were more frequent in the intervention group (0.04 [CI -0.03 to 0.12], < 0.01).
Relevance To Patient Care And Clinical Practice: Mifepristone and misoprostol together demonstrated higher delivery success rates and comparable safety outcomes to misoprostol alone, demonstrating the potential of improving patient care and positively impacting the time to successful delivery for patients at the bedside.
Conclusions: The use of mifepristone and misoprostol together for the resolution of miscarriage and intrauterine fetal death is warranted over the use of misoprostol alone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10600280241289968 | DOI Listing |
Neurointervention
February 2025
Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Alfried Krupp Hospital Rüttenscheid, Essen, Germany.
Torcular dural sinus malformations (tDSMs) with high-flow fistulas pose complex management challenges due to their vascularity and the delicate neuroanatomy involved. This report presents the case of a child with tDSM and hydrocephalus, who underwent 3 staged embolization procedures but required a redo intervention due to residual malformation and venous hypertension. Utilizing the pressure cooker technique (PCT) in a redo setting allowed for high-pressure, targeted embolic delivery with minimized reflux, achieving near-complete occlusion and significant symptom relief.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThromb J
January 2025
College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Background: Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulants are widely used in the prevention of VTE in NS patients. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has not been studied intensively in NS patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Ovarian Res
January 2025
Department of Health Education, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.3, Zizhulin Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210003, China.
Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPis) have shown promising effectiveness for ovarian cancer. This network meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number CRD42024503390) comprehensively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of PARPis in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC).
Methods: Articles published before January 6, 2024 were obtained from electronic databases.
Virol J
January 2025
Division of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Background: Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a marine bacterium causing seafood-associated gastrointestinal illness in humans and acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) in shrimp. Bacteriophages have emerged as promising biocontrol agents against V. parahaemolyticus.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Pulm Med
January 2025
Department of Oncology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
Introduction: Although there are a number of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combinations that can be applied to the treatment of perioperative non-small cell lung cancer patients, the optimal treatment combination strategy has not yet been determined.
Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.go and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from major international conferences for literature related to neoadjuvant immunotherapy combinations published as first-line treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer from the start of the library to 20 February 2024, and performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!