AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates the effectiveness of loop-end ileostomy (EI), introduced in 2021, in reducing stoma outlet obstruction (SOO) in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), compared to traditional loop ileostomy (LI).
  • - Researchers analyzed 106 patients with diverting ileostomy, finding that EI significantly lowered the incidence of SOO (odds ratio 0.18) despite similar patient characteristics and surgery factors between the two groups.
  • - The conclusion suggests that EI is a promising approach to minimize SOO complications following RPC and IPAA, particularly in more complex anastomosis cases.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Stoma outlet obstruction (SOO) is a serious complication of restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). When the ileal mesentery to the pouch is under excessive tension, the ileum near the ileostomy twists easily, causing SOO. Loop-end ileostomy (EI) for fecal diversion was introduced in 2021 to prevent SOO, and we aimed to verify whether temporary EI reduces the incidence of SOO in RPC and IPAA patients relative to loop ileostomy (LI).

Methods: This study included 106 consecutive RPC and IPAA patients with a diverting ileostomy and categorized them into LI (n = 75) or EI (n = 31) groups. The clinical characteristics of the patients were analyzed and compared.

Results: Patient characteristics were similar between the groups, except for higher preoperative steroid use in the LI group (38.7%; p = 0.0116). There were no significant differences between the groups in anatomical factors, such as abdominal wall thickness and the height-adjusted distance between the root of the superior mesenteric artery and the bottom of the external anal sphincter. There were no significant differences in surgery-related factors, with ≥ 90% of the patients in each group undergoing laparoscopic procedures. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that EI significantly reduced the risk of SOO relative to LI (OR, 0.18; 95% CI 0.03-0.92; p = 0.0399).

Conclusion: EI reduced SOO levels after RPC and IPAA and may be beneficial for cases in which anastomosis is challenging.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02944-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rpc ipaa
12
loop ileostomy
8
stoma outlet
8
outlet obstruction
8
restorative proctocolectomy
8
ileal pouch-anal
8
pouch-anal anastomosis
8
ipaa patients
8
soo
6
ileostomy
5

Similar Publications

Background: Pouchitis is the most common complication of restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We previously reported the presence of anti-integrin αvβ6 antibodies in the serum of patients with UC. This study investigated the association between anti-integrin αvβ6 antibodies and the development of pouchitis in patients with UC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the gold standard surgical treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) unresponsive to medical therapy and those with familial adenomatous polyposis. Robotic IPAA is a safe and feasible option for the surgical treatment of UC in children. The feasibility of IPAA without ileostomy has been demonstrated in adult in the modified two-stage approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigates the effectiveness of loop-end ileostomy (EI), introduced in 2021, in reducing stoma outlet obstruction (SOO) in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), compared to traditional loop ileostomy (LI).
  • - Researchers analyzed 106 patients with diverting ileostomy, finding that EI significantly lowered the incidence of SOO (odds ratio 0.18) despite similar patient characteristics and surgery factors between the two groups.
  • - The conclusion suggests that EI is a promising approach to minimize SOO complications following RPC and IPAA, particularly in more complex anastomosis cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Diverting ileostomy (DS) after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) can be omitted in selected patients. Its omission could improve functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL), as has been demonstrated in patients after proctectomy. The aim of this study was to report the impact of diverting ileostomy on functional outcomes and QoL after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: To better inform the risk of cuffitis in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), we aimed to identify its occurrence and associated precolectomy factors in a large multicenter cohort of patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of individuals diagnosed with UC or indeterminate colitis who underwent RPC with IPAA for refractory disease or dysplasia at Mount Sinai Hospital or the University of Chicago followed by at least 1 pouchoscopy with report of the pouch-anal anastomosis. The primary outcome was cuffitis defined as ulceration of the cuff as reported in each pouchoscopy report.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!